These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11890321)

  • 1. On the use of nonparametric curves in phase I trials with low toxicity tolerance.
    Cheung YK
    Biometrics; 2002 Mar; 58(1):237-40. PubMed ID: 11890321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Curve-free and model-based continual reassessment method designs.
    O'Quigley J
    Biometrics; 2002 Mar; 58(1):245-9. PubMed ID: 11890323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A nonparametric Bayesian method for dose finding in drug combinations cancer trials.
    Razaee ZS; Cook-Wiens G; Tighiouart M
    Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(6):1059-1080. PubMed ID: 35075652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of the continual reassessment method to a phase I dose-finding trial in Japanese patients: East meets West.
    Morita S
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2090-7. PubMed ID: 21500239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of prior variance in the Bayesian continual reassessment method.
    Lee SM; Cheung YK
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2081-9. PubMed ID: 21413054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A nonparametric Bayesian continual reassessment method in single-agent dose-finding studies.
    Tang N; Wang S; Ye G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):172. PubMed ID: 30563454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A curve-free method for phase I clinical trials.
    Gasparini M; Eisele J
    Biometrics; 2000 Jun; 56(2):609-15. PubMed ID: 10877324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The continual reassessment method: comparison of Bayesian stopping rules for dose-ranging studies.
    Zohar S; Chevret S
    Stat Med; 2001 Oct; 20(19):2827-43. PubMed ID: 11568943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Borrowing historical information to improve phase I clinical trials using meta-analytic-predictive priors.
    Chen X; Zhang J; Jiang Q; Yan F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Jan; 32(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 35594366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent.
    Muenz DG; Braun TM; Taylor JM
    Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):386-397. PubMed ID: 29779418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A logistic dose-ranging method for phase I clinical investigations trials.
    Murphy JR; Hall DL
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Nov; 7(4):635-47. PubMed ID: 9358335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.
    Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 27435150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose control.
    Tighiouart M; Rogatko A; Babb JS
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(14):2183-96. PubMed ID: 15909291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian dose-finding design for outcomes evaluated with uncertainty.
    Schipper MJ; Yuan Y; Taylor JM; Ten Haken RK; Tsien C; Lawrence TS
    Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 18(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 33884907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.
    Goodman SN; Zahurak ML; Piantadosi S
    Stat Med; 1995 Jun; 14(11):1149-61. PubMed ID: 7667557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. np1: a computer program for dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials.
    Kramar A; Houédé N; Paoletti X
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Oct; 88(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 17719124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.
    Braun TM
    Control Clin Trials; 2002 Jun; 23(3):240-56. PubMed ID: 12057877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The continual reassessment method and its applications: a Bayesian methodology for phase I cancer clinical trials.
    Ishizuka N; Ohashi Y
    Stat Med; 2001 Sep 15-30; 20(17-18):2661-81. PubMed ID: 11523075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical model-based dose-finding in phase I clinical trials: methods based on toxicity.
    Thall PF; Lee SJ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 12801254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A robust two-stage design identifying the optimal biological dose for phase I/II clinical trials.
    Zang Y; Lee JJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 27538818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.