379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11890334)
1. Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification.
Omejc M; Juvan R; Jelenc F; Repse S
Int Surg; 2001; 86(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11890334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma.
Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T
Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.
Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N
ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.
Hidaka H; Eto T; Maehara N; Jimi S; Hotokezaka M; Chijiiwa K
Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(88):2269-72. PubMed ID: 19260520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Problems in the N-classification of the new 1997 UICC TNM stage classification for gastric cancer: an analysis of over 10 years' outcome of Japanese patients.
Nio Y; Yamasawa K; Yamaguchi K; Itakura M; Omori H; Koike M; Kitamura Y; Tsuji M; Endo S; Ogo Y; Yano S; Sumi S
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(1B):697-705. PubMed ID: 12680170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Relationship between metastatic rate and amount of lymph nodes and prognosis of gastric cancer].
Li K; Xu HM; Chen JQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 85(30):2113-6. PubMed ID: 16313820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer?
Huang B; Zheng X; Wang Z; Wang M; Dong Y; Zhao B; Xu H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18998065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma.
Hayashi H; Ochiai T; Suzuki T; Shimada H; Hori S; Takeda A; Miyazawa Y
Surgery; 2000 Feb; 127(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 10686976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer.
Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A new lymph-node staging system for gastric cancer].
Peng K; Liu L; Zhang Y; Gong S; Quan ; Shao Y
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 39(12):908-10. PubMed ID: 16201167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric cancer.
Kunisaki C; Shimada H; Nomura M; Matsuda G; Otsuka Y; Ono H; Akiyama H
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(2B):1369-75. PubMed ID: 15865093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of the prognostic value of UICC and JGCA lymph node staging criteria for gastric cancer].
Pan Y; Liang H; Xue Q; Zhang RP; Cui QH; Liu N; Wang BG
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 May; 30(5):376-80. PubMed ID: 18953840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the UICC/AJCC 1992 and 1997 pN categories for gastric cancer patients after surgery.
Wu CW; Hsieh MC; Lo SS; Shen KH; Lui WY; P'eng FK
Hepatogastroenterology; 2001; 48(37):279-84. PubMed ID: 11268985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reappraisal of the new UICC staging system for gastric cancer: problem in lymph node stage.
Lee WJ; Hong RL; Lai IR; Chen CN; Lee PH; Chung KC
Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(45):860-4. PubMed ID: 12064008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.
Sun Z; Xu Y; Li de M; Wang ZN; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu HM
Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20336791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of old and new TNM systems for nodal staging in adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction.
de Manzoni G; Pedrazzani C; Verlato G; Roviello F; Pasini F; Pugliese R; Cordiano C
Br J Surg; 2004 Mar; 91(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 14991629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer.
Yoo CH; Noh SH; Kim YI; Min JS
World J Surg; 1999 May; 23(5):492-7; discussion 497-8. PubMed ID: 10085399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Impact of new lymph node staging on lymphadenectomy and on the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer].
Ramacciato G; Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Pezzoli F; Bellagamba R; Nigri G; Cicchini C; Ravaioli M; Ercolani G; Vetrone G; Del Gaudio M; De Angelis R
Chir Ital; 2006; 58(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 16845863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
