These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11892122)

  • 1. Pitch perception through the cochlear implant for speech and music.
    Hiki S; Fukuda Y
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():12-4. PubMed ID: 11892122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rhythm processing in cochlear implant-mediated music perception.
    Jiam NT; Limb CJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2019 Oct; 1453(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 31168793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():67-74. PubMed ID: 21756585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Limb CJ; Roy AT
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():13-26. PubMed ID: 23665130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of a pitch perception model to investigate the effect of stimulation field spread on the pitch ranking abilities of cochlear implant recipients.
    Erfanian Saeedi N; Blamey PJ; Burkitt AN; Grayden DB
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():129-37. PubMed ID: 25193552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of speech intonation production and perception abilities of Farsi speaking cochlear implanted and normal hearing children.
    Moein N; Khoddami SM; Shahbodaghi MR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():1-6. PubMed ID: 28964276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients.
    Arnoldner C; Kaider A; Hamzavi J
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17003738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.
    Luo X; Padilla M; Landsberger DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1325-36. PubMed ID: 22352506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Chen JK; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Hsieh JC; Tung TH; Li LP
    Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e793-800. PubMed ID: 20211951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy.
    Francart T; Osses A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 25697275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of fine structure and extended low frequencies in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
    Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Katzinger M; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 75(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 21324531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of electric hearing on children's timbre and pitch perception and talker discrimination.
    Sjoberg KM; Driscoll VD; Gfeller K; Welhaven AE; Kirk KI; Prusick L
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Jan; 18(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 28098512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emotional and analytic music perception in cochlear implant users after optimizing the speech processor.
    Rosslau K; Spreckelmeyer KN; Saalfeld H; Westhofen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 132(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22026456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of polyphony with cochlear implants for 2 and 3 simultaneous pitches.
    Penninger RT; Kludt E; Limb CJ; Leman M; Dhooge I; Buechner A
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):431-6. PubMed ID: 24518404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.
    Oxenham AJ
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2018 Jan; 69():27-50. PubMed ID: 29035691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cortical activity and speech perception performance in cochlear implant users.
    Fujiki N; Naito Y; Hirano S; Kojima H; Shiomi Y; Nishizawa S; Konishi J; Honjo I
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():32-5. PubMed ID: 11892178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience-induced malleability in neural encoding of pitch, timbre, and timing.
    Kraus N; Skoe E; Parbery-Clark A; Ashley R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jul; 1169():543-57. PubMed ID: 19673837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Musical melody and speech intonation: singing a different tune.
    Zatorre RJ; Baum SR
    PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(7):e1001372. PubMed ID: 22859909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.