These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11892132)

  • 1. Auditory responses of field L to electrical stimulation.
    Lim D; Oh S; Chang SO; Kim CS
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():15-7. PubMed ID: 11892132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitch correlates of direct auditory nerve electrical stimulation.
    Simmons FB; White RL; Walker MG; Mathews RG
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1981; 90(2 Pt 3):15-8. PubMed ID: 6784645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protocol for determining the auditory percepts of electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    Michelson RP; Schubert E; Walsh S; White M
    Laryngoscope; 1979 May; 89(5 Pt 1):748-51. PubMed ID: 449518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An eight channel scala tympani electrode for auditory prostheses.
    Hochmair-Desoyer I; Hochmair ES
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1980 Jan; 27(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 6892626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design, construction and mechanical optimisation process of electrode with radial current flow in the scala tympani.
    Deman PR; Kaiser TM; Dirckx JJ; Offeciers FE; Peeters SA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Sep; 128(1-2):143-50. PubMed ID: 12948557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biophysical measurements in the implanted cochlea.
    Spelman FA; Pfingst BE; Miller JM; Hassul M; Powers WE; Clopton BM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1980; 88(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 6773014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implants: the view from the brain.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA; Snyder RL
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2005 Aug; 15(4):488-93. PubMed ID: 16009544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.
    Spelman FA; Clopton BM; Pfingst BE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():3-8. PubMed ID: 6814331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and fabrication of multiwire scala tympani electrodes.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Hochmair ES; Burian K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():173-82. PubMed ID: 6575641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
    Shepherd RK; Matsushima J; Martin RL; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysical evaluation of cochlear prostheses in a monkey model.
    Pfingst BE; Donaldson JA; Miller JM; Spelman FA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1979; 88(5 Pt 1):613-25. PubMed ID: 115356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.
    Cartee LA; Miller CA; van den Honert C
    Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):10-21. PubMed ID: 16624511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear or nerve stimulation.
    White RL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 2):232-6. PubMed ID: 2436184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience with implanted auditory nerve stimulator.
    Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Burian K
    Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1979; 25():357-61. PubMed ID: 583313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of half-band and full-band electrodes for intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Xu SA; McAnally KI; Xu J; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 May; 102(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8489166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigations towards an artificial cochlea.
    Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Burian K
    Int J Artif Organs; 1979 Sep; 2(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 582589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The facial nerve canal: an important cochlear conduction path revealed by Clarion electrical field imaging.
    Vanpoucke F; Zarowski A; Casselman J; Frijns J; Peeters S
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 May; 25(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 15129106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural mechanisms relevant to the design of an auditory prosthesis. Location and electrical characteristics.
    Clopton BM; Spelman FA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():9-14. PubMed ID: 6814332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):452-68. PubMed ID: 15296005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.