These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11892180)

  • 1. Speech discrimination scores of postlingually deaf adults implanted with the Combi 40 cochlear implant.
    Gstoettner WK; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():323-6. PubMed ID: 11892180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech discrimination scores of postlingually deaf adults implanted with the Combi 40 cochlear implant.
    Gstoettner WK; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Sep; 118(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 9840498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of postlingually deafened adults using the SPEAK and CIS coding strategies.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM; Ng AH
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():425-9. PubMed ID: 11892208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
    Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Schmidt R; Kaftan H; Hosemann W; Gräbel S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Speech discrimination in post-lingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Lautischer M; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):487-91. PubMed ID: 10890126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.
    Drennan WR; Won JH; Timme AO; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 26656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial results of patients implanted in the MED-EL Combi 40+ investigational trial at Virginia Mason Medical Center.
    Quigley SM; Brazil-Pierce C; Dobaj H; Backous DD
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():442-6. PubMed ID: 11892212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of the number of active electrodes on tone and speech perception by Nucleus 22 cochlear implant users with SPEAK strategy.
    Hsu CJ; Horng MJ; Fu QJ
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():257-9. PubMed ID: 11892162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of apical stimulation to Mandarin speech perception in users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Qi B; Liu B; Krenmayr A; Liu S; Gong S; Liu H; Zhang N; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jan; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20863152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition by a deaf-blind multichannel cochlear implant patient.
    Martin EL; Burnett PA; Himelick TE; Phillips MA; Over SK
    Ear Hear; 1988 Apr; 9(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 3366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound and speech recognition ability in Korean cochlear implantees, prelingually deaf children.
    Lee SH; Kim CS; Kim HN; Kim LS; Cho TH
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():343-6. PubMed ID: 11892185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for postlinguistically deaf adults.
    Skinner MW; Binzer SM; Fredrickson JM; Smith PG; Holden TA; Holden LK; Juelich MF; Turner BA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1092-9. PubMed ID: 3172956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiological results with the cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA; Brimacombe JA; Eisenberg LS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):27-34. PubMed ID: 6805394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results from 88 prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: an analysis of predictive factors.
    Kiefer J; von Ilberg C; Gall V; Diller G; Spelsberg A; Neumann K
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():202-8. PubMed ID: 11892148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 7-year speech perception results and the effects of age, residual hearing and preimplant speech perception in prelingually deaf children using the Nucleus and Clarion cochlear implants.
    Tyler RS; Kelsay DM; Teagle HF; Rubinstein JT; Gantz BJ; Christ AM
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():305-10. PubMed ID: 11892175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability.
    Munson B; Donaldson GS; Allen SL; Collison EA; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):925-35. PubMed ID: 12597186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.