These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11892184)

  • 1. Changes in electrical thresholds and dynamic range over time in children with cochlear implants.
    Lee MY; Kim SJ; Huh MJ; Kim LS
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():339-42. PubMed ID: 11892184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial results of patients implanted in the MED-EL Combi 40+ investigational trial at Virginia Mason Medical Center.
    Quigley SM; Brazil-Pierce C; Dobaj H; Backous DD
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():442-6. PubMed ID: 11892212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results from 88 prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: an analysis of predictive factors.
    Kiefer J; von Ilberg C; Gall V; Diller G; Spelsberg A; Neumann K
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():202-8. PubMed ID: 11892148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sound and speech recognition ability in Korean cochlear implantees, prelingually deaf children.
    Lee SH; Kim CS; Kim HN; Kim LS; Cho TH
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():343-6. PubMed ID: 11892185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship of the implant electrical auditory brainstem response threshold to the postoperative T level in children with cochlear implants.
    Kim LS; Kim SR; Heo SD; Lee MY
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():270-2. PubMed ID: 11892165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on patients using a cochlear prosthesis.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Dec; 105(6):797-801. PubMed ID: 1787969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiological results in children with a cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA; Tonokawa LL; Petersen B; Eisenberg LS
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(3 Suppl):27S-35S. PubMed ID: 3839473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of the number of active electrodes on tone and speech perception by Nucleus 22 cochlear implant users with SPEAK strategy.
    Hsu CJ; Horng MJ; Fu QJ
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():257-9. PubMed ID: 11892162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 7-year speech perception results and the effects of age, residual hearing and preimplant speech perception in prelingually deaf children using the Nucleus and Clarion cochlear implants.
    Tyler RS; Kelsay DM; Teagle HF; Rubinstein JT; Gantz BJ; Christ AM
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():305-10. PubMed ID: 11892175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The phenomenon of nystagmus upon electrical stimulation in a cochlear implant patient.
    Wong EC; See HK; Yu HC
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():189-91. PubMed ID: 11892145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [No Hearing Sensation after cochlear implantation despite successful objective measurement outcome].
    Gärtner L; Büchner A; Joseph G; Neuburger J; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Apr; 90(4):224-5. PubMed ID: 21181621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of increasing the instantaneous input dynamic range in paediatric cochlear implant recipients.
    Veekmans K; Honeyman J; Daft M; Hawker K; Johnson S; Twomey T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():473-8. PubMed ID: 21756676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Sequential cochlear implantation in an adult with extremely asymmetric hearing-experience].
    Giourgas A; Gärtner L; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2013 Nov; 92(11):756-8. PubMed ID: 23873276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and function: a physical and electrical description of the 3M House cochlear implant system.
    Fretz RJ; Fravel RP
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(3 Suppl):14S-19S. PubMed ID: 3839470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear implantation in the elderly.
    Herzog M; Mueller J; Milewski C; Schoen F; Helms J
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():393-6. PubMed ID: 11892199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Nucleus Double Array cochlear implant for obliterated cochleae.
    Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Frohne C; Büchner A; Parker J
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():354-9. PubMed ID: 11892187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blink reflex and auditory speech perception in prelingually cochlear-implanted children.
    Emamdjomeh H; Shafaghat L; Abbassalipour P; Hassanzadeh S; Alaeddini F; Farhadi M; Daneshi A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15823805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.