109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11892186)
1. New electrode concepts (modiolus-hugging electrodes).
Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Goldring JE; Neuburger J; Kuzma J; Reuter G
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():347-53. PubMed ID: 11892186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [No Hearing Sensation after cochlear implantation despite successful objective measurement outcome].
Gärtner L; Büchner A; Joseph G; Neuburger J; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Apr; 90(4):224-5. PubMed ID: 21181621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative stapedius reflex measurements after deep electrode insertion compared with postoperative fitting values in cochlear implant patients.
Zupancic J; Battelino S
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():316-9. PubMed ID: 11892177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship of the implant electrical auditory brainstem response threshold to the postoperative T level in children with cochlear implants.
Kim LS; Kim SR; Heo SD; Lee MY
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():270-2. PubMed ID: 11892165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Studies on the optimal electrode position in patients with cochlea implants].
Lesinski-Schiedat A
Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Oct; 81(10):741-2. PubMed ID: 12397526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation.
Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Hear Res; 1988 Nov; 36(2-3):153-62. PubMed ID: 3209488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intracellular recording from the primary auditory cortex.
Nishiyama N; Paolini AG; Shepherd RK
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():18-21. PubMed ID: 11892141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Experiences in Kiel with the cochlear implant].
Müller-Deile J; Schmidt BJ; Rudert H
Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jun; 73(6):300-10. PubMed ID: 8060448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on cochlear nuclear neuron size in deaf kittens.
Kawano A; Seldon HL; Clark GM; Hakuhisa E; Funasaka S
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():33-5. PubMed ID: 9042444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implant patients.
Kasper A; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):285-94. PubMed ID: 1475097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The phenomenon of nystagmus upon electrical stimulation in a cochlear implant patient.
Wong EC; See HK; Yu HC
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():189-91. PubMed ID: 11892145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of stapedius reflex in cochlear implant of congenitally deaf children.
Ura M; Owa T; Nong D; Fusato N; Noda Y
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():165-7. PubMed ID: 11892137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of round window electrophysiological techniques in the selection of children for cochlear implants.
Gibson W; Sanli H
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():148-51. PubMed ID: 11892131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of half-band and full-band electrodes for intracochlear electrical stimulation.
Xu SA; McAnally KI; Xu J; Clark GM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 May; 102(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8489166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Event-related potentials with selected electrodes of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
Ash KR; Shallop JK
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():163-5. PubMed ID: 7668617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
