These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11892203)

  • 1. Benefit of ACE compared to CIS and SPEAK coding strategies.
    Kim HN; Shim YJ; Chung MH; Lee YH
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():408-11. PubMed ID: 11892203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception results in adults implanted with the CLARION Multi-Strategy cochlear implant.
    Osberger MJ; Fisher L; Kalberer A
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():421-4. PubMed ID: 11892207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of the number of active electrodes on tone and speech perception by Nucleus 22 cochlear implant users with SPEAK strategy.
    Hsu CJ; Horng MJ; Fu QJ
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():257-9. PubMed ID: 11892162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sound and speech recognition ability in Korean cochlear implantees, prelingually deaf children.
    Lee SH; Kim CS; Kim HN; Kim LS; Cho TH
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():343-6. PubMed ID: 11892185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of postlingually deafened adults using the SPEAK and CIS coding strategies.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM; Ng AH
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():425-9. PubMed ID: 11892208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results in patients with congenital profound hearing loss with intracochlear multichannel implants.
    Manrique MJ; Huarte A; Amor JC; Baptista P; Garcia-Tapia R
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():222-30. PubMed ID: 8273484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Sequential cochlear implantation in an adult with extremely asymmetric hearing-experience].
    Giourgas A; Gärtner L; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2013 Nov; 92(11):756-8. PubMed ID: 23873276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing and Patient Satisfaction Among 19 Patients Who Received Implants Intended for Hybrid Hearing: A Two-Year Follow-Up.
    Erixon E; Rask-Andersen H
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e271-8. PubMed ID: 25932703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in postlinguistically deafened adult cochlear implant users.
    Shipp D; Nedzelski J; Chen J; Hanusaik L
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():74-7. PubMed ID: 9042454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of speech perception benefits with SPEAK and ACE coding strategies in pediatric Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant recipients.
    Pasanisi E; Bacciu A; Vincenti V; Guida M; Berghenti MT; Barbot A; Panu F; Bacciu S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 64(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 12049828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (nucleus).
    Kiefer J; Müller J; Pfennigdorff T; Schön F; Helms J; von Ilberg C; Baumgartner W; Gstöttner W; Ehrenberger K; Arnold W; Stephan K; Thumfart W; Baur S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1996; 58(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 8797215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implants: patient selection and preoperative assessment.
    Montandon P; Pelizzone M
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():66-73. PubMed ID: 9042453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech-coding strategy (MED EL Combi-40) compared to the MPEAK and SPEAK strategies (Nucleus).
    Kiefer J; Müller J; Pfenningdorff T; Schön F; Helms J; von Ilberg C; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Ehrenberger K; Arnold W; Stephan K; Thumfart W; Baur S
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():286-90. PubMed ID: 9042507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception and production results in children implanted between 2 and 5 years of age.
    Waltzman S; Cohen NL; Gomolin R; Green J; Shapiro W; Brackett D; Zara C
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():177-80. PubMed ID: 9042482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implantation in the elderly.
    Herzog M; Mueller J; Milewski C; Schoen F; Helms J
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():393-6. PubMed ID: 11892199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception results in children implanted with the CLARION Multi-Strategy cochlear implant.
    Osberger MJ; Fisher L; Kalberer A
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():417-20. PubMed ID: 11892205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results from 88 prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants: an analysis of predictive factors.
    Kiefer J; von Ilberg C; Gall V; Diller G; Spelsberg A; Neumann K
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():202-8. PubMed ID: 11892148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory performance with simultaneous intracochlear multichannel stimulation.
    Parkin JL; Randolph LJ
    Laryngoscope; 1991 Apr; 101(4 Pt 1):379-83. PubMed ID: 1895853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.