201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11892956)
21. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology.
Schieve LA; Meikle SF; Ferre C; Peterson HB; Jeng G; Wilcox LS
N Engl J Med; 2002 Mar; 346(10):731-7. PubMed ID: 11882728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Birth outcomes of intended pregnancies among women who used assisted reproductive technology, ovulation stimulation, or no treatment.
D'Angelo DV; Whitehead N; Helms K; Barfield W; Ahluwalia IB
Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):314-320.e2. PubMed ID: 21718990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Outcomes from assisted reproductive technology.
Van Voorhis BJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):183-200. PubMed ID: 16394060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: a population-based study.
Boulet SL; Schieve LA; Nannini A; Ferre C; Devine O; Cohen B; Zhang Z; Wright V; Macaluso M
Hum Reprod; 2008 Aug; 23(8):1941-8. PubMed ID: 18487216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000.
Reynolds MA; Schieve LA; Martin JA; Jeng G; Macaluso M
Pediatrics; 2003 May; 111(5 Pt 2):1159-62. PubMed ID: 12728130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Babies born after ART treatment cost more than non-ART babies: a cost analysis of inpatient birth-admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation pregnancies.
Chambers GM; Chapman MG; Grayson N; Shanahan M; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2007 Dec; 22(12):3108-15. PubMed ID: 17905747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contribution of assisted reproductive technology and ovulation-inducing drugs to triplet and higher-order multiple births--United States, 1980-1997.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2000 Jun; 49(24):535-8. PubMed ID: 10923854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother.
Romundstad LB; Romundstad PR; Sunde A; von Düring V; Skjaerven R; Vatten LJ
Hum Reprod; 2006 Sep; 21(9):2353-8. PubMed ID: 16728419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
Henne MB; Bundorf MK
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17482603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures.
Clayton HB; Schieve LA; Peterson HB; Jamieson DJ; Reynolds MA; Wright VC
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 16507930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative birth weights of singletons born after assisted reproduction and natural conception in previously infertile women.
De Geyter C; De Geyter M; Steimann S; Zhang H; Holzgreve W
Hum Reprod; 2006 Mar; 21(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 16284064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Are children born after assisted reproductive technology at increased risk for adverse health outcomes?
Schieve LA; Rasmussen SA; Buck GM; Schendel DE; Reynolds MA; Wright VC
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 15172847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimation of the contribution of non-assisted reproductive technology ovulation stimulation fertility treatments to US singleton and multiple births.
Schieve LA; Devine O; Boyle CA; Petrini JR; Warner L
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 170(11):1396-407. PubMed ID: 19854803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
Gunby J; Daya S;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assisted reproductive technology and trends in low birthweight--Massachusetts, 1997-2004.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2009 Jan; 58(3):49-52. PubMed ID: 19177038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000.
Wang YA; Sullivan EA; Black D; Dean J; Bryant J; Chapman M
Fertil Steril; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1650-8. PubMed ID: 15950632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pregnancy loss among pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1999-2002.
Farr SL; Schieve LA; Jamieson DJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 165(12):1380-8. PubMed ID: 17351291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
