262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11893398)
1. Methods of in vitro toxicology.
Eisenbrand G; Pool-Zobel B; Baker V; Balls M; Blaauboer BJ; Boobis A; Carere A; Kevekordes S; Lhuguenot JC; Pieters R; Kleiner J
Food Chem Toxicol; 2002; 40(2-3):193-236. PubMed ID: 11893398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hazard identification by methods of animal-based toxicology.
Barlow SM; Greig JB; Bridges JW; Carere A; Carpy AJ; Galli CL; Kleiner J; Knudsen I; Koëter HB; Levy LS; Madsen C; Mayer S; Narbonne JF; Pfannkuch F; Prodanchuk MG; Smith MR; Steinberg P
Food Chem Toxicol; 2002; 40(2-3):145-91. PubMed ID: 11893397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
Kavlock R; Dix D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The contribution of epidemiology.
van den Brandt P; Voorrips L; Hertz-Picciotto I; Shuker D; Boeing H; Speijers G; Guittard C; Kleiner J; Knowles M; Wolk A; Goldbohm A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2002; 40(2-3):387-424. PubMed ID: 11893402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilization of animal studies to determine the effects and human risks of environmental toxicants (drugs, chemicals, and physical agents).
Brent RL
Pediatrics; 2004 Apr; 113(4 Suppl):984-95. PubMed ID: 15060191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-animal approaches for toxicokinetics in risk evaluations of food chemicals.
Punt A; Peijnenburg AACM; Hoogenboom RLAP; Bouwmeester H
ALTEX; 2017; 34(4):501-514. PubMed ID: 28403478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro tests within the REACH information strategies.
Louekari K; Sihvonen K; Kuittinen M; Sømnes V
Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Aug; 34(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 16945005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century (TT21C): Making safety decisions using toxicity pathways, and progress in a prototype risk assessment.
Adeleye Y; Andersen M; Clewell R; Davies M; Dent M; Edwards S; Fowler P; Malcomber S; Nicol B; Scott A; Scott S; Sun B; Westmoreland C; White A; Zhang Q; Carmichael PL
Toxicology; 2015 Jun; 332():102-11. PubMed ID: 24582757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From Classical Toxicology to Tox21: Some Critical Conceptual and Technological Advances in the Molecular Understanding of the Toxic Response Beginning From the Last Quarter of the 20th Century.
Choudhuri S; Patton GW; Chanderbhan RF; Mattia A; Klaassen CD
Toxicol Sci; 2018 Jan; 161(1):5-22. PubMed ID: 28973688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of intake from the diet.
Kroes R; Müller D; Lambe J; Löwik MR; van Klaveren J; Kleiner J; Massey R; Mayer S; Urieta I; Verger P; Visconti A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2002; 40(2-3):327-85. PubMed ID: 11893401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproductive Toxicology. Editorial.
Piersma AH
Reprod Toxicol; 2010 Aug; 30(1):1. PubMed ID: 20580665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Toxicokinetics and physiologically based toxicokinetics in toxicology and risk assessment.
Dixit R; Riviere J; Krishnan K; Andersen ME
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 12587252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A critical appraisal of the process of regulatory implementation of novel in vivo and in vitro methods for chemical hazard and risk assessment.
Piersma AH; Ezendam J; Luijten M; Muller JJ; Rorije E; van der Ven LT; van Benthem J
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2014 Nov; 44(10):876-94. PubMed ID: 25058877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Novel Assessment Methodologies in Toxicology on Green Chemistry and Chemical Alternatives.
Rusyn I; Greene N
Toxicol Sci; 2018 Feb; 161(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 29378069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and other substances of concern in food contact materials: an updated review of exposure, effect and risk assessment.
Muncke J
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 2011 Oct; 127(1-2):118-27. PubMed ID: 21073950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current and future needs for developmental toxicity testing.
Makris SL; Kim JH; Ellis A; Faber W; Harrouk W; Lewis JM; Paule MG; Seed J; Tassinari M; Tyl R
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2011 Oct; 92(5):384-94. PubMed ID: 21922641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Food contact materials: an effect-based evaluation of the presence of hazardous chemicals in paper and cardboard packaging.
Selin E; Svensson K; Gravenfors E; Giovanoulis G; Iida M; Oskarsson A; Lundqvist J
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2021 Sep; 38(9):1594-1607. PubMed ID: 34157954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shellfish and residual chemical contaminants: hazards, monitoring, and health risk assessment along French coasts.
Guéguen M; Amiard JC; Arnich N; Badot PM; Claisse D; Guérin T; Vernoux JP
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011; 213():55-111. PubMed ID: 21541848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
