These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11893399)

  • 21. Toxicology of micronutrients: adverse effects and uncertainty.
    Renwick AG
    J Nutr; 2006 Feb; 136(2):493S-501S. PubMed ID: 16424134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Principles of risk assessment for determining the safety of chemicals: recent assessment of residual solvents in drugs and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
    Hasegawa R; Koizumi M; Hirose A
    Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2004 Jun; 44(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15198717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A probabilistic effect assessment model for hazardous substances at the workplace.
    Schneider K; Schuhmacher-Wolz U; Hassauer M; Darschnik S; Elmshäuser E; Mosbach-Schulz O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 16356615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pesticide residue analysis and its relationship to hazard characterisation (ADI/ARfD) and intake estimations (NEDI/NESTI).
    Renwick AG
    Pest Manag Sci; 2002 Oct; 58(10):1073-82. PubMed ID: 12400449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Chemical risk assessment and uncertainty associated with extrapolation across exposure duration.
    Pohl HR; Chou CH; Ruiz P; Holler JS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Jun; 57(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19944126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. It is time to develop ecological thresholds of toxicological concern to assist environmental hazard assessment.
    Belanger SE; Sanderson H; Embry MR; Coady K; DeZwart D; Farr BA; Gutsell S; Halder M; Sternberg R; Wilson P
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2864-9. PubMed ID: 26111584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating noncancer effects of trichloroethylene: dosimetry, mode of action, and risk assessment.
    Barton HA; Clewell HJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2000 May; 108 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):323-34. PubMed ID: 10807562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does EU legislation allow the use of the Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach for risk assessment?
    Brandon EF; Bulder AS; van Engelen JG; Mahieu CM; Mennes WC; Pronk ME; Rietveld AG; van de Ven BM; Ten Voorde SE; Wolterink G; Slob W; Zeilmaker MJ; Bessems JG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 23871753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of wildlife hazard levels using interspecies correlation models and standard laboratory rodent toxicity data.
    Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(24):1604-9. PubMed ID: 20077235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is the acceptable daily intake as presently used an axiom or a dogma?
    Galli CL; Marinovich M; Lotti M
    Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 18588960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A consistent and transparent approach for calculation of Derived No-Effect Levels (DNELs) for petroleum substances.
    Boogaard PJ; Banton MI; Dalbey W; Hedelin AS; Riley AJ; Rushton EK; Vaissière M; Minsavage GD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 62(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 22178770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative analysis of toxicological evaluations for dermal exposure performed under two different EU regulatory frameworks.
    Westerholm E; Schenk L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Feb; 68(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24269627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of mechanistic information in risk assessment for toxic chemicals.
    Becking GC
    Toxicol Lett; 1995 May; 77(1-3):15-24. PubMed ID: 7618129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The application of non-default uncertainty factors in the U.S. EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Part I: UF(L), UF(S), and "other uncertainty factors".
    Stedeford T; Zhao QJ; Dourson ML; Banasik M; Hsu CH
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2007; 25(3):245-79. PubMed ID: 17763048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet.
    Kroes R; Renwick AG; Cheeseman M; Kleiner J; Mangelsdorf I; Piersma A; Schilter B; Schlatter J; van Schothorst F; Vos JG; Würtzen G;
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jan; 42(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 14630131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating noncancer uncertainty factors: are ratios NOAELs informative?
    Brand KP; Rhomberg L; Evans JS
    Risk Anal; 1999 Apr; 19(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 10765406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predicted no effect concentration derivation as a significant source of variability in environmental hazard assessments of chemicals in aquatic systems: an international analysis.
    Hahn T; Diamond J; Dobson S; Howe P; Kielhorn J; Koennecker G; Lee-Steere C; Mangelsdorf I; Schneider U; Sugaya Y; Taylor K; Dam RV; Stauber JL
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jan; 10(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23913910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing.
    Kroes R; Galli C; Munro I; Schilter B; Tran L; Walker R; Würtzen G
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2000; 38(2-3):255-312. PubMed ID: 10717364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Regulatory aspects of genotoxicity testing: from hazard identification to risk assessment.
    Blakey D; Galloway SM; Kirkland DJ; MacGregor JT
    Mutat Res; 2008 Nov; 657(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 18926925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Human health screening level risk assessments of tertiary-butyl acetate (TBAC): calculated acute and chronic reference concentration (RfC) and Hazard Quotient (HQ) values based on toxicity and exposure scenario evaluations.
    Bus JS; Banton MI; Faber WD; Kirman CR; McGregor DB; Pourreau DB
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2015 Feb; 45(2):142-71. PubMed ID: 25629921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.