BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11893637)

  • 1. Assessment of agreement between general practitioners and radiologists as to whether a radiation exposure is justified.
    Dhingsa R; Finlay DB; Robinson GD; Liddicoat AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 75(890):136-9. PubMed ID: 11893637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of mailed dissemination of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on general practitioner referrals for radiography: a time series analysis.
    Matowe L; Ramsay CR; Grimshaw JM; Gilbert FJ; Macleod MJ; Needham G
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Jul; 57(7):575-8. PubMed ID: 12096854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of postal distribution of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X-ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kerry S; Oakeshott P; Dundas D; Williams J
    Fam Pract; 2000 Feb; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 10673488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on general practitioners' referrals for radiographic examination.
    Oakeshott P; Kerry SM; Williams JE
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 May; 44(382):197-200. PubMed ID: 8204331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communication at the interface: do better referral letters produce better consultant replies?
    Grol R; Rooijackers-Lemmers N; van Kaathoven L; Wollersheim H; Mokkink H
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Mar; 53(488):217-9. PubMed ID: 14694699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on referral from general practice. Royal College of Radiologists Working Party.
    BMJ; 1993 Jan; 306(6870):110-1. PubMed ID: 8435606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The emergency department: an appropriate referral rate for radiography.
    Richards PJ; Tins B; Cherian R; Rae F; Dharmarajah R; Phair IC; McCall I
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Aug; 57(8):753. PubMed ID: 12169288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The value of joint general practitioner and rheumatologist consultations in primary care patients].
    Schulpen GJ; Vierhout WP; van der Heijde DM; Landewé RB; van der Linden S; Winkens RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Mar; 147(10):447-50. PubMed ID: 12666516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Joint consultation of general practitioner and rheumatologist: does it matter?
    Schulpen GJ; Vierhout WP; van der Heijde DM; Landewé RB; Winkens RA; van der Linden S
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2003 Feb; 62(2):159-61. PubMed ID: 12525386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do family physicians request ultrasound scans appropriately?
    Landry BA; Barnes D; Keough V; Watson A; Rowe J; Mallory A; Abdolell M
    Can Fam Physician; 2011 Aug; 57(8):e299-304. PubMed ID: 21841093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Appropriateness of imaging procedure requests: do radiologists agree?
    Kahn CE; Michalski TA; Erickson SJ; Foley WD; Krasnow AZ; Lofgren RP; Quiroz FA; Rand SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jul; 169(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9207492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Boneline: evaluation of an initiative to improve communication between specialists and general practitioners.
    Roland M; Bewley B
    J Public Health Med; 1992 Sep; 14(3):307-9. PubMed ID: 1419209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidelines, training and quality assurance: influence on general practitioner MRI referral quality.
    Kara S; Smart A; Officer T; Dassanayake C; Clark P; Smit A; Cavadino A
    J Prim Health Care; 2019 Sep; 11(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 32171376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An audit of knee radiographs performed for general practitioners.
    Morgan B; Mullick S; Harper WM; Finlay DB
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Mar; 70():256-60. PubMed ID: 9166050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary-care radiology referrals: a randomised trial.
    Eccles M; Steen N; Grimshaw J; Thomas L; McNamee P; Soutter J; Wilsdon J; Matowe L; Needham G; Gilbert F; Bond S
    Lancet; 2001 May; 357(9266):1406-9. PubMed ID: 11356439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective.
    Grieve FM; Plumb AA; Khan SH
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 83(985):17-22. PubMed ID: 19470574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National audit of appropriate imaging.
    Remedios D; Drinkwater K; Warwick R;
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Oct; 69(10):1039-44. PubMed ID: 25037149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of radiological referral practice and effect of computer-based guidelines on radiological requests in two emergency departments.
    Carton M; Auvert B; Guerini H; Boulard JC; Heautot JF; Landre MF; Beauchet A; Sznajderi M; Brun-Ney D; Chagnon S
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Feb; 57(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 11977945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographers and radiologists reporting plain radiograph requests from accident and emergency and general practice.
    Brealey SD; King DG; Hahn S; Crowe M; Williams P; Rutter P; Crane S
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Jun; 60(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 16038699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information in general medical practice: a qualitative approach.
    Wood F; Ellis D; Bacigalupo R; Simpson S
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1995 Nov; 16(2):10-8. PubMed ID: 10152474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.