230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11894707)
1. [Mammography screening in the county of Copenhagen. Results of the first three screening rounds].
Tange UB; Hirsch FR; Jensen MB; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Vejborg IM; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(8):1048-52. PubMed ID: 11894707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Seventeen-years overview of breast cancer inside and outside screening in Denmark.
Domingo L; Jacobsen KK; von Euler-Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Schwartz W; Sala M; Lynge E
Acta Oncol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 22943386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early outcome of mammography screening in Copenhagen 1991-99.
Vejborg I; Olsen AH; Jensen MB; Rank F; Tange UB; Lynge E
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12370322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Balancing sensitivity and specificity: sixteen year's of experience from the mammography screening programme in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Utzon-Frank N; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 35(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 21239242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mammographic screening in the municipality of Copenhagen. Results of the first screening round].
Jørgensen T; Jensen LB; Duun S; Hirsch FR; Mouridsen HT; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Christensen LH; Hansen AG; Nissen FH
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(9):1212-7. PubMed ID: 8644425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacobsen KK; von Euler Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Lynge E
J Med Screen; 2017 Mar; 24(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27206815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.
Sala M; Comas M; Macià F; Martinez J; Casamitjana M; Castells X
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 19420316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 17626709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Mammographic screening in the county of Copenhagen. Clinical consequences of the first three screening rounds].
Tange UB; Hirsch FR; Jensen MB; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Vejborg IM; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(8):1036-40. PubMed ID: 11894704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer incidence after the start of mammography screening in Denmark.
Olsen AH; Jensen A; Njor SH; Villadsen E; Schwartz W; Vejborg I; Lynge E
Br J Cancer; 2003 Feb; 88(3):362-5. PubMed ID: 12569377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark.
Kemp Jacobsen K; O'Meara ES; Key D; S M Buist D; Kerlikowske K; Vejborg I; Sprague BL; Lynge E; von Euler-Chelpin M
Int J Cancer; 2015 Nov; 137(9):2198-207. PubMed ID: 25944711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program.
Olsen AH; Agbaje OF; Myles JP; Lynge E; Duffy SW
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 16848843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden.
Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Svane G; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Nyström L
Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):728-33. PubMed ID: 16137757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. First report of introducing population-based breast cancer screening in Poland: experience of the 3-million population region of Lower Silesia.
Matkowski R; Szynglarewicz B
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):e111-5. PubMed ID: 21840281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of breast cancer after false-positive test results in screening mammography.
von Euler-Chelpin M; Risør LM; Thorsted BL; Vejborg I
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 May; 104(9):682-9. PubMed ID: 22491228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
