BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11895258)

  • 1. The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: peer review of performance in the workplace.
    Southgate L; Cox J; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; Johnson N; Jolly B; Macdonald E; McAvoy P; McCrorie P; Turner J
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():9-19. PubMed ID: 11895258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures.
    Southgate L; Cox J; David T; Hatch D; Howes A; Johnson N; Jolly B; Macdonald E; McAvoy P; McCrorie P; Turner J
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():2-8. PubMed ID: 11895250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Training the assessors for the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures.
    McAvoy PA; McCrorie P; Jolly B; Ayers AB; Cox J; Howes AD; Macdonald EB; Slimmon DJ; Southgate L
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():29-35. PubMed ID: 11895252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. UK doctors' attitudes to the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures, 1997-99.
    McManus IC; Winder BC; Gordon D
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():60-9. PubMed ID: 11895256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The General Medical Council's Performance Procedures: the development and implementation of tests of competence with examples from general practice.
    Southgate L; Campbell M; Cox J; Foulkes J; Jolly B; McCrorie P; Tombleson P
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():20-8. PubMed ID: 11895251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Senior health professional's perceptions of variations in medical practice: a qualitative and quantitative study.
    Hutchinson A; McIntosh A; Williams M; Barbour RS
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():45-51. PubMed ID: 11895254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Good medical practice: the duties of a doctor registered with the General Medical Council.
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():70-8. PubMed ID: 11895257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review - a safety and quality improvement initiative in a general practice.
    Rutherford A
    Aust Fam Physician; 2011; 40(1-2):30-2. PubMed ID: 21301690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should a professional assessor of technical evidence sit as a member of the court in complex legal cases?
    Clin Med (Lond); 2002; 2(5):485-6. PubMed ID: 12448606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blueprinting for clinical performance deficiencies--lessons and principles from the General Medical Council's fitness to practise procedures.
    Sales D; Sturrock A; Boursicot K; Dacre J
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(3):e111-4. PubMed ID: 20218825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.
    Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the performance of specialist registrars.
    Wragg A; Wade W; Fuller G; Cowan G; Mills P
    Clin Med (Lond); 2003; 3(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 12737369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reproducibility of assessing radiological reporting: studies from the development of the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures.
    Jolly BC; Ayers B; Macdonald MM; Armstrong P; Chalmers AH; Roberts G; Southgate LH
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():36-44. PubMed ID: 11895253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.
    Beard JD; Marriott J; Purdie H; Crossley J
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. PubMed ID: 21227024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development of clinical governance in the UK: its implications for rehabilitation medicine.
    Turner-Stokes L
    Clin Med (Lond); 2003; 3(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 12737370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Yesterday's doctors.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1998 Nov; 352(9140):1566-7. PubMed ID: 9843096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical management. Where medicine meets management. On reflection.
    Archer JC; Davies H
    Health Serv J; 2004 Apr; 114(5903):26-7. PubMed ID: 15137300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Good Medical Practice: comparing the views of doctors and the general population.
    Peters J; McManus IC; Hutchinson A
    Med Educ; 2001 Dec; 35 Suppl 1():52-9. PubMed ID: 11895255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation in clinical practice: problems, precedents and principles.
    McIntyre N
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Sep; 1(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 9238553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing doctors' competence: application of CUSUM technique in monitoring doctors' performance.
    Lim TO; Soraya A; Ding LM; Morad Z
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 12108535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.