222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11895299)
1. Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification.
Bagnall MJ; Evans AJ; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Denley H; Geraghty JG; Ellis IO
Clin Radiol; 2001 Oct; 56(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 11895299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy.
O'Flynn EA; Morel JC; Gonzalez J; Dutt N; Evans D; Wasan R; Michell MJ
Clin Radiol; 2009 Feb; 64(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 19103348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic size of ductal carcinoma in situ does not predict the presence of an invasive focus.
Wahedna Y; Evans AJ; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Blamey RW; Geraghty JG
Eur J Cancer; 2001 Mar; 37(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 11267854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only.
Dillon MF; McDermott EW; Quinn CM; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jun; 93(7):559-63. PubMed ID: 16705731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in mammographically detected microcalcification in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC
Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Apr; 208(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 22445178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive factors for invasive cancer in surgical specimens following an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in microcalcification-only lesions.
Gümüş H; Mills P; Fish D; Gümüş M; Cox K; Devalia H; Jones S; Jones P; Sever AR
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2016; 22(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 26509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass.
Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
King TA; Farr GH; Cederbom GJ; Smetherman DH; Bolton JS; Stolier AJ; Fuhrman GM
Am Surg; 2001 Sep; 67(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 11565774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical biopsy is still necessary for BI-RADS 4 calcifications found on digital mammography that are technically too faint for stereotactic core biopsy.
Jeffries DO; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Joe AI; Pinsky RW; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Dec; 154(3):557-61. PubMed ID: 26589316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted?
Lee CH; Carter D; Philpotts LE; Couce ME; Horvath LJ; Lange RC; Tocino I
Radiology; 2000 Nov; 217(2):466-70. PubMed ID: 11058647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lesion size is a major determinant of the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the Sloane project.
Evans A; Clements K; Maxwell A; Bishop H; Hanby A; Lawrence G; Pinder SE;
Clin Radiol; 2010 Mar; 65(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 20152272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-grade histologic features of DCIS are associated with R5 rather than R3 calcifications in breast screening mammography.
Hayes BD; Brodie C; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM
Breast J; 2013; 19(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 23600490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in ductal carcinoma in situ initially diagnosed by core biopsy.
Chan MY; Lim S
Asian J Surg; 2010 Apr; 33(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 21029943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ and its implications for surgical practice.
Dillon MF; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):740-3. PubMed ID: 16803949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Radiologic-histopathologic correlation of microcalcifications from 11g vacuum biopsy: analysis of 3196 core biopsies].
Fischmann A; Pietsch-Breitfeld B; Müller-Schimpfle M; Siegmann K; Wersebe A; Rothenberger-Janzen K; Claussen CD; Janzen J
Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 15088178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging Features of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.
Grimm LJ; Ghate SV; Hwang ES; Soo MS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 28705686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How significant is detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme?
Kessar P; Perry N; Vinnicombe SJ; Hussain HK; Carpenter R; Wells CA
Clin Radiol; 2002 Sep; 57(9):807-14. PubMed ID: 12384106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Nori J; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):863-76. PubMed ID: 17891529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions?
Hoorntje LE; Peeters PH; Mali WP; Borel Rinkes IH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15319568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
