These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11897542)

  • 1. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m and its dependence on stimulus duration.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 113(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 11897542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Habituation of the auditory evoked field component N100m in male patients with schizophrenia.
    Rosburg T; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I; Nowak H; Sauer H
    J Psychiatr Res; 2000; 34(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 10867120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Brain Topogr; 2002; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12371675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?
    Lütkenhöner B; Lammertmann C; Knecht S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(5):263-78. PubMed ID: 11729329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term habituation of auditory evoked potential and neuromagnetic field components in dependence of the interstimulus interval.
    Rosburg T; Zimmerer K; Huonker R
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Sep; 205(4):559-70. PubMed ID: 20711562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Takeshima Y
    Neuroscience; 2002; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.
    Seither-Preisler A; Patterson R; Krumbholz K; Seither S; Lütkenhöner B
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):88-98. PubMed ID: 16464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemispheric differences in frequency dependent dipole orientation of the human auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I; Emmerich E; Nowak H; Sauer H
    Neurosci Lett; 1998 Dec; 258(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 9875538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch.
    Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 12811003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity of the neuromagnetic N100m deflection to spectral bandwidth: a function of the auditory periphery?
    Seither-Preisler A; Krumbholz K; Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(6):322-37. PubMed ID: 14566103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.
    Krumbholz K; Patterson RD; Seither-Preisler A; Lammertmann C; Lütkenhöner B
    Cereb Cortex; 2003 Jul; 13(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 12816892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dipole location shift within the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components N100m and mismatch negativity (MMNm).
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):906-13. PubMed ID: 15003772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
    Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Ragot R; Schwartz D; Ducorps A; Norena A; Durrant JD; Bonmartin A; Cotton F; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15504604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased right auditory cortex activity in absolute pitch possessors.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1775-9. PubMed ID: 16237325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency.
    Roberts TP; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1996 Apr; 7(6):1138-40. PubMed ID: 8817518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The response decrease of auditory evoked potentials by repeated stimulation--Is there evidence for an interplay between habituation and sensitization?
    Rosburg T; Sörös P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):397-408. PubMed ID: 26004505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.