These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11898016)

  • 1. The effects of augmented sensory feedback precision on the acquisition and retention of a simulated chiropractic task.
    Scaringe JG; Chen D; Ross D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002 Jan; 25(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 11898016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidance hypothesis with verbal feedback in learning a palpation skill.
    Pringle RK
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Jan; 27(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 14739872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of augmented sensory feedback precision on the acquisition and retention of a simulated chiropractic task.
    Enebo BA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Oct; 26(8):533; author reply 533-4. PubMed ID: 14569219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Average KR schedule in learning of timing: influence of length for summary knowledge of results and task complexity.
    Ishikura T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):911-24. PubMed ID: 16491697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic Augmented Feedback and Dependency in Spinal Manipulation Learning: a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Lardon A; Cheron C; Pagé I; Dugas C; Descarreaux M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2016; 39(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 27016338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of knowledge of results scheduling methods for promoting motor skill acquisition and retention.
    Weeks DL; Sherwood DE
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1994 Jun; 65(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 8047705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects.
    Vander Linden DW; Cauraugh JH; Greene TA
    Phys Ther; 1993 Feb; 73(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 8421721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning spinal manipulation: the importance of augmented feedback relating to various kinetic parameters.
    Descarreaux M; Dugas C; Lalanne K; Vincelette M; Normand MC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16517384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of manual guidance and knowledge of results in the learning of a weight-bearing skill.
    Sidaway B; Ahn S; Boldeau P; Griffin S; Noyes B; Pelletier K
    J Neurol Phys Ther; 2008 Mar; 32(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 18463553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Summary and frequency of KR presentation effects on retention of a motor skill.
    Sidaway B; Moore B; Schoenfelder-Zohdi B
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1991 Mar; 62(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 2028090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience and practice organization in learning a simulated high-velocity low-amplitude task.
    Enebo B; Sherwood D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Jan; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 15726033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Qualitative and quantitative knowledge of results: effects on motor learning.
    Kilduski NC; Rice MS
    Am J Occup Ther; 2003; 57(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 12785672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Augmented Feedback and Expertise on Spinal Manipulation Skills: An Experimental Study.
    Pasquier M; Cheron C; Dugas C; Lardon A; Descarreaux M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2017; 40(6):404-410. PubMed ID: 28822474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning.
    Anderson DI; Magill RA; Sekiya H; Ryan G
    J Mot Behav; 2005 May; 37(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15883120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor learning in children: feedback effects on skill acquisition.
    Sullivan KJ; Kantak SS; Burtner PA
    Phys Ther; 2008 Jun; 88(6):720-32. PubMed ID: 18339797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of visual feedback on manipulation performance and patient ratings.
    Triano JJ; Scaringe J; Bougie J; Rogers C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jun; 29(5):378-85. PubMed ID: 16762666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. KR-withdrawal and self-paced motor performance.
    Travlos AK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Dec; 89(3 Pt 2):1111-26. PubMed ID: 10710759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis.
    Winstein CJ; Pohl PS; Lewthwaite R
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1994 Dec; 65(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 7886280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motor skill acquisition and retention as a function of average feedback, summary feedback, and performance variability.
    Yao WX; Fischman MG; Wang YT
    J Mot Behav; 1994 Sep; 26(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 15757843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of traditional and reversed bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning.
    Cauraugh JH; Chen D; Radlo SJ
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1993 Dec; 64(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 8278667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.