335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11899786)
21. Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography.
Cyrlak D
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):661-3. PubMed ID: 3406395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.
Mango VL; Goel A; Mema E; Kwak E; Ha R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 30632645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness study.
Lindfors KK; McGahan MC; Rosenquist CJ; Hurlock GS
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):710-7. PubMed ID: 16569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An academic health center cost analysis of screening mammography: creating a financially viable service.
Chen SL; Clark S; Pierce LJ; Hayes DF; Helvie MA; Greeno PL; Newman LA; Chang AE
Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 15329914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Regarding trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography.
Ellis RL
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 16373783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Low-cost mass screening with mammography as a means of reducing overall mortality from breast cancer.
McLelland R
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):1007-13. PubMed ID: 3306771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice.
Gur D; Wallace LP; Klym AH; Hardesty LA; Abrams GS; Shah R; Sumkin JH
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 15770039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality-oriented mass mammography screening.
Burhenne LJ; Burhenne HJ; Kan L
Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 7997549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The British Columbia Mammography Screening Program: evaluation of the first 15 months.
Burhenne LJ; Hislop TG; Burhenne HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 1307850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Decision analysis for the cost effectiveness of sestamibi scintimammography in minimizing unnecessary biopsies.
Allen MW; Hendi P; Schwimmer J; Bassett L; Gambhir SS
Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 10967626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis.
Wong G; Howard K; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Nov; 52(5):916-29. PubMed ID: 18789566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in Spain.
Plans P; Casademont L; Salleras L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1996; 12(1):146-50. PubMed ID: 8690555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies.
Lindfors KK; Rosenquist CJ
JAMA; 1995 Sep; 274(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7674501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of life expectancy in cancer screening guidelines. Moving with caution from model-based evidence to evidence-based guidelines.
Lantz PM; Ubel PA
J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 20(6):552-3. PubMed ID: 15987335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia.
Hall J; Gerard K; Salkeld G; Richardson J
Soc Sci Med; 1992 May; 34(9):993-1004. PubMed ID: 1631612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Costs of breast cancer and the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening.
Elixhauser A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(4):604-15. PubMed ID: 1778705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative estimates of the impact of sensitivity and specificity in mammographic screening in Germany.
Warmerdam PG; de Koning HJ; Boer R; Beemsterboer PM; Dierks ML; Swart E; Robra BP
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Apr; 51(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 9196649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States.
White E; Urban N; Taylor V
Annu Rev Public Health; 1993; 14():605-33. PubMed ID: 8323604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Development of a protocol for evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women under 50 with a family history of breast cancer.
Mackay J; Rogers C; Fielder H; Blamey R; Macmillan D; Boggis C; Brown J; Pharoah PD; Moss S; Day NE; Myles J; Austoker J; Gray J; Cuzick J; Duffy SW
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2001; 6(5):365-9; discussion 371-5. PubMed ID: 11822726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
