These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11900420)

  • 21. Does display configuration affect information sampling performance?
    Brand JL; Orenstein HB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Mar; 41(3):286-301. PubMed ID: 9520626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ocular measures of redundancy gain during visual search of colour symbolic displays.
    Backs RW; Walrath LC
    Ergonomics; 1995 Sep; 38(9):1831-40. PubMed ID: 7671860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist.
    Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A test of the effectiveness of sensor lines showing linkages between displays and controls.
    Chapanis A; Lockhead GR
    Hum Factors; 1965 Jun; 7(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 5867017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. New respirator fit test panels representing the current U.S. civilian work force.
    Zhuang Z; Bradtmiller B; Shaffer RE
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Sep; 4(9):647-59. PubMed ID: 17613722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Usability of liquid crystal displays for research in the temporal characteristics of perception and attention.
    Kihara K; Kawahara J; Takeda Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):1105-13. PubMed ID: 21139178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Display-control relationships for Chinese subjects using three controls.
    Courtney AJ
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1991 Jun; 20(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 1820380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The complex role of perceptual organization in visual display design theory.
    Sanderson PM; Haskell I; Flach JM
    Ergonomics; 1992 Oct; 35(10):1199-219. PubMed ID: 1516576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tiled++: an enhanced tiled hi-res display wall.
    Ebert A; Thelen S; Olech PS; Meyer J; Hagen H
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2010; 16(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 19910666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Integrated displays and the perception of graphical data.
    Goettl BP; Wickens CD; Kramer AF
    Ergonomics; 1991 Aug; 34(8):1047-63. PubMed ID: 1935882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling growth and individual differences in spatial tasks.
    Thomas H; Lohaus A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1993; 58(9):1-191. PubMed ID: 8295633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Determining the validity of the visual field principle for designing control/display arrangements.
    Hoffmann ER; Chan AHS; Man SS; Chan LCM
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102887. PubMed ID: 31422265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age differences in feature search as a function of exposure duration.
    Harpur LL; Scialfa CT; Thomas DM
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 7744167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The composite illusion requires composite face stimuli to be biologically plausible.
    Taubert J; Alais D
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1877-85. PubMed ID: 19426751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hemispheric differences in recognizing upper and lower facial displays of emotion.
    Prodan CI; Orbelo DM; Testa JA; Ross ED
    Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol; 2001; 14(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 11725213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantitative evaluation of three advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies: a stereo endoscope, an image projection display, and a TFT display.
    Wentink M; Jakimowicz JJ; Vos LM; Meijer DW; Wieringa PA
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Aug; 16(8):1237-41. PubMed ID: 11984691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems.
    Liu YC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Mar; 44(4):425-42. PubMed ID: 11291824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dual displays.
    Tlauka M; Stanton D; McKenna FP
    Ergonomics; 2000 Jun; 43(6):764-70. PubMed ID: 10902886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.