These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11901959)

  • 21. A developmental investigation of the first-letter advantage.
    Grainger J; Bertrand D; Lété B; Beyersmann E; Ziegler JC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Dec; 152():161-172. PubMed ID: 27552299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual letter similarity effects during sentence reading: Evidence from the boundary technique.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():142-149. PubMed ID: 30119047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reduced orthographic learning in dyslexic adult readers: evidence from patterns of letter search.
    Pitchford NJ; Ledgeway T; Masterson J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):99-113. PubMed ID: 18609393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of script direction on word processing modes in left and right visual fields.
    Siéroff E; Slama Y
    Laterality; 2018 Jul; 23(4):479-500. PubMed ID: 29141494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
    Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
    Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text.
    Drieghe D; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1701-1716. PubMed ID: 28967779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lexical priming from partial-word previews.
    Inhoff AW; Tousman S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Sep; 16(5):825-36. PubMed ID: 2147444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exterior letters are not privileged in the early stage of visual word recognition during reading: comment on Jordan, Thomas, Patching and Scott-Brown (2003).
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Skelly M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):894-9. PubMed ID: 14516222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. English and Hebrew letter report by English- and Hebrew-reading subjects: evidence for stimulus control, not hemispheric asymmetry.
    Lubow RE; Tsal Y; Mirkin A; Mazliah G
    Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 8043265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming.
    Peressotti F; Grainger J
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 May; 61(4):691-706. PubMed ID: 10370337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Serial and parallel processing in reading: investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition.
    Dare N; Shillcock R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):487-504. PubMed ID: 22950804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Parafoveal processing in reading.
    Schotter ER; Angele B; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 22042596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: evidence against parafoveal lexical activation.
    Johnson RL; Dunne MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):191-212. PubMed ID: 22060141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.
    Payne BR; Stites MC; Federmeier KD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1839-1857. PubMed ID: 27428778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Morphological preview effects in English are restricted to suffixed words.
    Dann KM; Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1338-1352. PubMed ID: 34014756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is nevtral NEUTRAL? Visual similarity effects in the early phases of written-word recognition.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1180-1185. PubMed ID: 27873186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.