These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Joersz M N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Banning partial-birth abortions: a few inches away from testing post-viability jurisprudence. Flanagan PP Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):141-77. PubMed ID: 16514753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The vagueness of partial-birth abortion bans: deconstruction or destruction? Rurka ML J Crim Law Criminol; 1999; 89(4):1233-68. PubMed ID: 14628850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban. Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB] Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute. Gough AD Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal failure or moral success? An evaluation of the ban on partial-birth abortion. Kolenc AB America (NY); 2004 Nov; 191(17):11-4. PubMed ID: 15675070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. State's partial-birth abortion ban supported. Chopko M; Moses M Origins; 2000 Mar; 29(38):617-23. PubMed ID: 11913443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Partial-birth abortion: the final frontier of abortion jurisprudence. Bopp J; Cook CR Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 9707939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appeals court voids ban on 'partial birth' abortions: U.S. law most likely headed to justices. Preston J N Y Times Web; 2005 Jul; ():A11. PubMed ID: 16060016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Stenberg v. Carhart: have the states lost their power to regulate abortion? Gauthier AM New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(3):625-68. PubMed ID: 15212038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Origins; 2003 Nov; 33(24):420-3. PubMed ID: 14982095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. South Carolina bans partial-birth abortions. Cooke EA S C Law Rev; 1998; 49(5):1041-57. PubMed ID: 15871154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Gordon A Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. Court in New York rejects partial-birth abortion ban. Preston J N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15540363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Candor and the court: the Supreme Court will confront as never before the violent nature of mid- and later-term abortion. Stith R America (NY); 2000 Apr; 182(11):13-5. PubMed ID: 11913437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The federal ban on so-called "partial-birth abortion" is a dangerous intrusion into medical practice. Blumenthal PD MedGenMed; 2003 Jun; 5(2):37. PubMed ID: 14603136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive? Guenther H Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(3):1021-44. PubMed ID: 16211757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]