These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11902179)

  • 21. "Partial birth" abortion and the health exception: protecting maternal health or risking abortion on demand?
    Glidewell G
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2001 Apr; 28(4):1089-150. PubMed ID: 12680381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
    Walther KE
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Possible ban on abortion technique leaves doctors uneasy.
    Duenwald M
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Apr; ():F5, F8. PubMed ID: 12812228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An inside look at partial birth abortion.
    Lowe LR
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998-1999; 24():327-57. PubMed ID: 16180289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose.
    Berkowitz JF
    J Crim Law Criminol; 2001; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The exception that swallowed the rule? Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Voinovich and the mental health exception to post-viability abortion bans.
    Wassom BD
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1999; 49(4):799-867. PubMed ID: 12173630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When does a fetus become a child in need of an advocate? Focusing on fetal pain.
    McDonald TB
    Child Leg Rights J; 1997; 17(2):12-9. PubMed ID: 12159907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Court rules that government can't outlaw type of abortion: a Nebraska case.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2000 Jun; ():A1. PubMed ID: 15586921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
    Schmutz SD
    Houst Law Rev; 2002; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A wink from the bench: the federal courts and abortion.
    Uddo BJ
    Tulane Law Rev; 1979 Feb; 53(2):398-464. PubMed ID: 11665104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions.
    Zenkich S
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. It's my body, it's my choice: the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Kushnir TF
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2004; 35(4):1117-88. PubMed ID: 15732189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. WomanCare of Southfield, P.C. v. Granholm.
    United States. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
    Wests Fed Suppl; 2001; 143():827-48. PubMed ID: 16479703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Jon O. Newman and the abortion decisions: a remarkable first year.
    Hurwitz AD
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 2002-2003; 46(1-2):231-47. PubMed ID: 16493839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Congressional control of federal court jurisdiction: the case study of abortion.
    Greenwood JS
    S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(4):1069-112. PubMed ID: 16493841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.