174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11902185)
1. Taking the "I" out of IRB--and putting "community" in.
Marshall MF
Bioethics Forum; 2000; 16(4):7-12. PubMed ID: 11902185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Much more research to fall under IRB review.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):3. PubMed ID: 11658059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do we need another advisory commission on human experimentation?
Katz J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 7730048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.
Edgar H; Rothman DJ
Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. IRB triage of projects that involve medical record review.
Amdur R; Speers MA; Bankert E
IRB; 2000 Jan; 22(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 12546009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: bridging the gaps in human subjects research protection.
Childress JF
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 15573433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Some questionable premises about research ethics.
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How to do human-subjects research if you do not have an institutional review board.
Rice TW
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1362-7. PubMed ID: 18812001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
Ross LF
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
Enfield KB; Truwit JD
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One unified policy recommended for all human research studies.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11833569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The National Ethics Commission disbands.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Dec; 16(12):5. PubMed ID: 11933959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research subjects to be told about conflicts of interest.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):3. PubMed ID: 12374175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Universal protection for all human research participants.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jul; 16(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11933953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The flip of the coin: exempt, expedited, or full IRB review?
Bliss-Holtz J
AACN Adv Crit Care; 2007; 18(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 17473550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
