These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11902344)

  • 1. Comparison of 2 wound volume measurement methods.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Olson B; Hanson D; Hunter S; Henly SJ; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2001; 14(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 11902344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
    Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Reliability of a Novel Mobile 3-dimensional Wound Measurement Device.
    Anghel EL; Kumar A; Bigham TE; Maselli KM; Steinberg JS; Evans KK; Kim PJ; Attinger CE
    Wounds; 2016 Nov; 28(11):379-386. PubMed ID: 27589359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of three-dimensional wound measurements using a novel 3D-WAM camera.
    Jørgensen LB; Skov-Jeppesen SM; Halekoh U; Rasmussen BS; Sørensen JA; Jemec GBE; Yderstraede KB
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Nov; 26(6):456-462. PubMed ID: 30118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An overview of techniques used to measure wound area and volume.
    Little C; McDonald J; Jenkins MG; McCarron P
    J Wound Care; 2009 Jun; 18(6):250-3. PubMed ID: 19661849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring healing in leg ulcers: practice considerations.
    Johnson M; Miller R
    Appl Nurs Res; 1996 Nov; 9(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 8961578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reliability of a handheld wound measurement and documentation device in clinical practice.
    Hammond CE; Nixon MA
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2011; 38(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 21483270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interrater and intrarater reliability of silhouette wound imaging device.
    Miller C; Karimi L; Donohue L; Kapp S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Nov; 25(11):513-8. PubMed ID: 23080239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques.
    Haghpanah S; Bogie K; Wang X; Banks PG; Ho CH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1396-402. PubMed ID: 17023252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods of measuring wound size: a comparative study.
    Plassmann P; Melhuish JM; Harding KG
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Sep; 40(7):50-2, 54, 56-60. PubMed ID: 7546091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring wound length, width, and area: which technique?
    Langemo D; Anderson J; Hanson D; Hunter S; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Jan; 21(1):42-5; quiz 45-7. PubMed ID: 18156829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Common problems in wound care: wound and ulcer measurement.
    Vowden K
    Br J Nurs; 1995 Jul 13-26; 4(13):775-6, 778-9. PubMed ID: 7655266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A practical framework for wound assessment. 2: Methods.
    Flanagan M
    Br J Nurs; 1997 Jan 9-22; 6(1):6, 8-11. PubMed ID: 9015994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and measurement error of digital planimetry for the measurement of chronic venous leg ulcers.
    Stacey MC; Phillips SA; Farrokhyar F; Swaine JM
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep; 25(5):901-905. PubMed ID: 28922511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring wounds.
    Hanson D; Langemo D; Anderson J; Hunter S; Thompson P
    Nursing; 2007 Feb; 37(2):18, 21. PubMed ID: 17273058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wound healing assessment: the clinical utility of wound healing rates.
    Margolis DJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Oct; 40(8):20-2, 24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 7546097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods to assess area and volume of wounds - a systematic review.
    Jørgensen LB; Sørensen JA; Jemec GB; Yderstraede KB
    Int Wound J; 2016 Aug; 13(4):540-53. PubMed ID: 26250714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability.
    Wendelken ME; Berg WT; Lichtenstein P; Markowitz L; Comfort C; Alvarez OM
    Wounds; 2011 Sep; 23(9):267-75. PubMed ID: 25879267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
    Kantor J
    JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.