These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11902495)

  • 1. Confusion over mammography screening intensifies.
    Lancet Oncol; 2002 Mar; 3(3):127. PubMed ID: 11902495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines are not supported by science: the scientific support for mammography screening.
    Kopans DB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):843-57. PubMed ID: 20868889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Global summit on mammographic screening.
    Boyle P
    Ann Oncol; 2003 Aug; 14(8):1159-60. PubMed ID: 12881366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. For breast cancer screening, there is room for improvement, report concludes.
    Randal J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Aug; 96(16):1200-1. PubMed ID: 15316051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening mammography in clinical practice. A complex activity.
    Love RR; Davis JE
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Jan; 151(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 1985596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographers' ranks shrink as demand for breast images grows.
    Washam C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(11):792-3. PubMed ID: 15928296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast tomosynthesis.
    Buzek N
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2009 Oct; 17(10):25-6, 28. PubMed ID: 20000159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New recommendations on mammography and cervical cancer screening disrupt US health reform debate.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2009 Nov; 339():b5012. PubMed ID: 19933737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer screening: controversies and future directions.
    Retsky M; Demicheli R; Hrushesky W
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 15(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12544495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast imaging flow models.
    Parikh JR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Apr; 1(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 17411578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for breast cancer: how useful are clinical breast examinations?
    Baines CJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jun; 92(12):958-9. PubMed ID: 10861299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
    Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing mammography's benefits and harms.
    Schmidt C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Apr; 106(4):dju103. PubMed ID: 24685934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Breast cancer screening 1984. I. Mammography as a challenge for radiology].
    Buraczewski J
    Nowotwory; 1985; 35(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 3831944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The risks and benefits of screening mammography.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10295360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re: Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
    Eisinger F
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Nov; 102(22):1742; author reply 1742, 1742-3. PubMed ID: 20966429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography.
    Simeoni R
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1992 Sep; 15(3):157. PubMed ID: 1471968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: 1 in 4 cancers detected by mammography are pseudocancers.
    Welch HG; Schwartz LM; Woloshin S
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7543):727. PubMed ID: 16565136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does practice make perfect when interpreting mammography?
    Elmore JG; Carney PA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Mar; 94(5):321-3. PubMed ID: 11880465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.