These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11903429)

  • 1. Analysis of the study design and manuscript deficiencies in research articles submitted to Emergency Medicine.
    Taylor DM; Brown AF
    Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2001 Dec; 13(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 11903429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.
    Lamb CR; Mai W
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 24798652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics and fate of orthodontic articles submitted for publication: An exploratory study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.
    Farjo N; Turpin DL; Coley RY; Feng J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):680-90. PubMed ID: 26038071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of types of research articles published in emergency medicine and non-emergency medicine journals.
    Singer AJ; Homan CS; Stark MJ; Werblud MC; Thode HC; Hollander JE
    Acad Emerg Med; 1997 Dec; 4(12):1153-8. PubMed ID: 9408432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fate of manuscripts rejected from the Red Journal.
    Holliday EB; Yang G; Jagsi R; Hoffman KE; Bennett KE; Grace C; Zietman AL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 25835616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The percentage of articles which were accepted or rejected for publication in the Dutch Journal of Medicine in 1997].
    Bloemenkamp DG; Hart W; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jan; 143(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 10086132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.
    Schriger DL; Kadera SP; von Elm E
    Ann Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 67(3):401-406.e6. PubMed ID: 26518378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study.
    Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):441-5. PubMed ID: 9708752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How statistical expertise is used in medical research.
    Altman DG; Goodman SN; Schroter S
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2817-20. PubMed ID: 12038922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
    Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.
    Cobo E; Selva-O'Callagham A; Ribera JM; Cardellach F; Dominguez R; Vilardell M
    PLoS One; 2007 Mar; 2(3):e332. PubMed ID: 17389922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction.
    Weber EJ; Katz PP; Waeckerle JF; Callaham ML
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2790-3. PubMed ID: 12038913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What happens to the manuscripts that have not been accepted for publication in Occupational and Environmental Medicine?
    Nemery B
    Occup Environ Med; 2001 Sep; 58(9):604-7. PubMed ID: 11511748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The fate of papers rejected by Australian Family Physician.
    Green R; Del Mar C
    Aust Fam Physician; 2006 Aug; 35(8):655-6. PubMed ID: 16915616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts.
    Silberzweig JE; Khorsandi AS
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1620-3. PubMed ID: 18693043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
    Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
    Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache.
    Hesterman CM; Szperka CL; Turner DP
    Headache; 2018 Nov; 58(10):1511-1518. PubMed ID: 30011058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.