107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11904461)
1. High resolution comparative genomic hybridization detects 7-8 megabasepair deletion in PCR amplified DNA.
Larsen J; Ottesen AM; Kirchhoff M; Lundsteen C; Larsen JK
Anal Cell Pathol; 2001; 23(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 11904461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors.
Huang Q; Schantz SP; Rao PH; Mo J; McCormick SA; Chaganti RS
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2000 Aug; 28(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 10862048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of DOP-PCR amplification of DNA for high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
Larsen J; Ottesen AM; Lundsteen C; Leffers H; Larsen JK
Cytometry; 2001 Aug; 44(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 11500848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimal sizes of deletions detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
Bentz M; Plesch A; Stilgenbauer S; Döhner H; Lichter P
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1998 Feb; 21(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 9491330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the reliability of chromosomal imbalances detected by combined use of universal DNA amplification and comparative genomic hybridization.
Harada T; Shiraishi K; Kusano N; Umayahara K; Kondoh S; Okita K; Sasaki K
Jpn J Cancer Res; 2000 Nov; 91(11):1119-25. PubMed ID: 11092976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization.
Kuukasjärvi T; Tanner M; Pennanen S; Karhu R; Visakorpi T; Isola J
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Feb; 18(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 9115969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole genome amplification for CGH analysis: Linker-adapter PCR as the method of choice for difficult and limited samples.
Pirker C; Raidl M; Steiner E; Elbling L; Holzmann K; Spiegl-Kreinecker S; Aubele M; Grasl-Kraupp B; Marosi C; Micksche M; Berger W
Cytometry A; 2004 Sep; 61(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15351986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization.
Voullaire L; Wilton L; Slater H; Williamson R
Prenat Diagn; 1999 Sep; 19(9):846-51. PubMed ID: 10521843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of 3 methods of whole-genome amplification for subsequent metaphase comparative genomic hybridization.
Ng G; Roberts I; Coleman N
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2005 Dec; 14(4):203-12. PubMed ID: 16319690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cytogenetic view of standard comparative genomic hybridization (CGH): deletions of 20q in human leukemia as a measure of the sensitivity of the technique.
Brecevic L; Verdorfer I; Saul W; Trautmann U; Gebhart E
Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(1A):89-92. PubMed ID: 11299794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic heterogeneity in a prostatic carcinoma and associated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia as demonstrated by combined use of laser-microdissection, degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR and comparative genomic hybridization.
Zitzelsberger H; Kulka U; Lehmann L; Walch A; Smida J; Aubele M; Lörch T; Höfler H; Bauchinger M; Werner M
Virchows Arch; 1998 Oct; 433(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 9808430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tissue microdissection and degenerate oligonucleotide primed-polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR) is an effective method to analyze genetic aberrations in invasive tumors.
Hirose Y; Aldape K; Takahashi M; Berger MS; Feuerstein BG
J Mol Diagn; 2001 May; 3(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 11333301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resolution of genotypic heterogeneity in prostate tumors using polymerase chain reaction and comparative genomic hybridization on microdissected carcinoma and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia foci.
Beheshti B; Vukovic B; Marrano P; Squire JA; Park PC
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2002 Aug; 137(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 12377408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole genome amplification and molecular genetic analysis of DNA from paraffin-embedded prostate adenocarcinoma tumor tissue.
Kim SH; Godfrey T; Jensen RH
J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1512-8. PubMed ID: 10492247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deletions below 10 megabasepairs are detected in comparative genomic hybridization by standard reference intervals.
Kirchhoff M; Gerdes T; Maahr J; Rose H; Bentz M; Döhner H; Lundsteen C
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Aug; 25(4):410-3. PubMed ID: 10398439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic DNA-chip hybridization reveals a higher incidence of genomic amplifications in pancreatic cancer than conventional comparative genomic hybridization and leads to the identification of novel candidate genes.
Holzmann K; Kohlhammer H; Schwaenen C; Wessendorf S; Kestler HA; Schwoerer A; Rau B; Radlwimmer B; Döhner H; Lichter P; Gress T; Bentz M
Cancer Res; 2004 Jul; 64(13):4428-33. PubMed ID: 15231651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of stage 4 neuroblastoma reveals high frequency of 11q deletion in tumors lacking MYCN amplification.
Plantaz D; Vandesompele J; Van Roy N; Lastowska M; Bown N; Combaret V; Favrot MC; Delattre O; Michon J; Bénard J; Hartmann O; Nicholson JC; Ross FM; Brinkschmidt C; Laureys G; Caron H; Matthay KK; Feuerstein BG; Speleman F
Int J Cancer; 2001 Mar; 91(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 11267980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors.
Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Piper J; Isola J; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1994 Aug; 10(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 7522536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple method for fixation and microdissection of frozen fresh tissue sections for molecular cytogenetic analysis of cancers.
Huang Q; Sacks PG; Mo J; McCormick SA; Iacob CE; Guo L; Schaefer S; Schantz SP
Biotech Histochem; 2005; 80(3-4):147-56. PubMed ID: 16298900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
