These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11905720)

  • 1. The use of dubious cell lines in research: is trust enough?
    Arlett CF
    Lancet Oncol; 2001 Aug; 2(8):467. PubMed ID: 11905720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Integrity in science: a constant concern].
    Drenth PJ
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):321-33. PubMed ID: 15641563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lessons in empowerment: honesty is essential for trust.
    Scanes CG
    Poult Sci; 2010 May; 89(5):859. PubMed ID: 20371834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
    Abbott A; Schwarz J
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research misconduct? What misconduct?
    Kondro W; Hebert PC
    CMAJ; 2007 Mar; 176(7):905, 907. PubMed ID: 17389430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct. Crime scene investigation: how to handle misconduct.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2006 Jun; 312(5779):1465. PubMed ID: 16763128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific misconduct.
    Parmley WW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Dec; 22(7):2055. PubMed ID: 8245364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The frustrations of scientific misconduct.
    Kassirer JP
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Jun; 328(22):1634-6. PubMed ID: 8387639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Misconduct in biomedical research].
    Kerkhof PL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Sep; 137(36):1843. PubMed ID: 8377866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research ethics. Germany gets in step with scientific misconduct rules.
    Bostanci A
    Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5574):1778. PubMed ID: 12052923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.
    Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S
    J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific misconduct. Australia probes kidney researcher.
    Dayton L
    Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5567):449. PubMed ID: 11964450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Misconduct in biomedical research].
    de Jong JW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jul; 137(28):1408-13. PubMed ID: 8345896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More questions about research misconduct.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5578):13. PubMed ID: 12098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shattuck Lecture--misconduct in medical research.
    Dingell JD
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Jun; 328(22):1610-5. PubMed ID: 8487803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud.
    Dayton L
    Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5568):641. PubMed ID: 11976422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research ethics. China's science ministry fires a barrage of measures at misconduct.
    Yidong G; Xin H
    Science; 2006 Jun; 312(5781):1728-9. PubMed ID: 16794046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining misconduct.
    Holton G; Grinnell F
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):858. PubMed ID: 8711469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misconduct: judgment called for.
    Buzzelli DE
    Science; 1996 May; 272(5264):937. PubMed ID: 8638129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Misconduct in clinical scientific investigations].
    De Broe ME
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):335-41. PubMed ID: 15641564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.