These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11906850)

  • 1. Image quality of screening mammography: effect on clinical outcome.
    Feig SA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):805-7. PubMed ID: 11906850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Should women 40 to 49 years of age be offered mammographic screening?
    Trop I; Deck W
    Can Fam Physician; 2006 Sep; 52(9):1050-2. PubMed ID: 17279208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Summaries for patients: the accuracy of film versus digital screening mammography.
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):I30. PubMed ID: 22007060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer.
    Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Finder C; Mandelson MT; Houn F; White E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 11906848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mammography].
    Grégoire A; Bernard C; Lavallée G; Morin C; Philie M
    Union Med Can; 1992; 121(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 1413293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast ultrasound--the 'gold standard' and other problems.
    Hackelöer BJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 11(6):385-7. PubMed ID: 9674082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose and image quality in mammography with an automatic beam quality system.
    Young KC; Ramsdale ML; Rust A
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 69(822):555-62. PubMed ID: 8757659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography.
    Miller AB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju125. PubMed ID: 24872544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Art of positioning needs revival in mammography.
    Eklund GW; Cardenosa G
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Sep; 13(9):131-40. PubMed ID: 10149736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Factors influencing quality of mammograms].
    Loewe C; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2003; 115 Suppl 2():40-5. PubMed ID: 15518145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Mammography for diagnosticians: what information is needed for diagnosis].
    Endo T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):642-8. PubMed ID: 16767819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-quality mammography: information for referring providers.
    Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin; 1994 Oct; (13):1-18. PubMed ID: 10892352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography.
    Kopans DB
    Lancet; 1993 Apr; 341(8850):957. PubMed ID: 8096288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discriminating analysis uncovers breast lesions.
    Kopans DB
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Sep; 13(9):94-101. PubMed ID: 10149734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current challenges of full field digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H; Van Steen A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):148-53. PubMed ID: 16461520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Breast cancer screening by mammography: evaluation by Gotzsche and Olsen meta-analysis].
    Agence Nationale d'Accrédiation et d'Evaluation en Santé
    J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 12741380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hormone replacement therapy, percent mammographic density, and sensitivity of mammography.
    Kavanagh AM; Cawson J; Byrnes GB; Giles GG; Marr G; Tong B; Gertig DM; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1060-4. PubMed ID: 15894653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.
    Poplack SP; Tosteson TD; Kogel CA; Nagy HM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):616-23. PubMed ID: 17715109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of mammography.
    Rasmussen EP; Barber WA; Duran C
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1990 Jun; 79(6):359-61. PubMed ID: 2370489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-view versus two-view mammography in baseline screening for breast cancer: a review.
    van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):971-6. PubMed ID: 1450833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.