412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11906892)
1. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Vo TT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):1007-15. PubMed ID: 11906892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.
Londero V; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Nori J; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):863-76. PubMed ID: 17891529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy.
Cheung YC; Wan YL; Chen SC; Lui KW; Ng SH; Yeow KM; Lee KF; Hsueh S
J Clin Ultrasound; 2002; 30(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 12116093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonography-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications: Comparison of the diagnostic yield of calcified cores and non-calcified cores on specimen radiographs.
Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Park SH; Lyou CY; Park IA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Mar; 51(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 19912076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.
Nagashima T; Hashimoto H; Oshida K; Nakano S; Tanabe N; Nikaido T; Koda K; Miyazaki M
Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16110292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast Microcalcifications: Diagnostic Outcomes According to Image-Guided Biopsy Method.
Bae S; Yoon JH; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kim EK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(5):996-1005. PubMed ID: 26357494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast mass.
Youk JH; Kim EK; Kim MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):1135-41. PubMed ID: 19304725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sonographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with ultrasonographically guided large core needle biopsy: correlation with mammographic and pathologic findings.
Schoonjans JM; Brem RF
J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Jul; 19(7):449-57. PubMed ID: 10898298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histological correlation of mammographically detected microcalcifications in stereotactic core biopsies.
Dahlstrom JE; Jain S
Pathology; 2001 Nov; 33(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 11827410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of one-pass breast lesion excision system in complete excision of high-risk breast lesions with atypia expressed as clusters of microcalcifications.
Christou A; Koutoulidis V; Koulocheri D; Panourgias E; Nonni A; Zografos CG; Zografos GC
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3149-3158. PubMed ID: 30617496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital mammography-guided skin marking for sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications.
Cho N; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):W132-6. PubMed ID: 19234241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications in breast lesions and long-term follow-up results.
Kim HS; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Oh KK
Korean J Radiol; 2008; 9(6):503-9. PubMed ID: 19039266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flat epithelial atypia in directional vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications: surgical excision may not be necessary.
McCroskey Z; Sneige N; Herman CR; Miller RA; Venta LA; Ro JY; Schwartz MR; Ayala AG
Mod Pathol; 2018 Jul; 31(7):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 29467479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Columnar cell lesions of the breast: mammographic and US features.
Kim MJ; Kim EK; Oh KK; Park BW; Kim H
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 60(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 16891081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in mammographically detected microcalcification in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC
Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Apr; 208(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 22445178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yang WT; Tse GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 14684521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
