141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11907547)
1. Peer review, unmasked.
Gura T
Nature; 2002 Mar; 416(6878):258-60. PubMed ID: 11907547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing.
Butler D
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):11. PubMed ID: 18596768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?
Liu SV
Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Open-access journal will publish first, judge later.
Giles J
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7123):9. PubMed ID: 17203032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards a new horizon.
Mrowietz U
Arch Dermatol Res; 2008 Jan; 300(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17960401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Headache online.
Schwedt TJ; Roberts J
Headache; 2010 May; 50(5):736-7. PubMed ID: 20546319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Publishers soldier on despite electronic bugs.
Dalton R
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):264. PubMed ID: 12124587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Changing scientific publishing.
Raff MC; Stevens CF; Roberts K; Shatz CJ; Roberts K; Shatz CJ; Newsome WT
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):945-6. PubMed ID: 15310878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. E-publication proposal.
Baum H
Science; 1999 Aug; 285(5430):1014. PubMed ID: 10475841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals.
Eysenbach G
J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e37. PubMed ID: 15471763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Life begins again at age 126!
Pietrini P; Ghelarducci B
Arch Ital Biol; 2008 Mar; 146(1):2p preceding 1. PubMed ID: 18666443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Internet and scientific publishing.
van Mil F
Pharm World Sci; 2003 Dec; 25(6):243. PubMed ID: 14689809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomedical research publication system.
Wang YL; Burridge K; Dembo M; Gabbiani G; Hanks SK; Hosoya H; Janmey P; Karlsson R; Lindberg U; Mabuchi I; Otey C; Rottner K; Small JV; Wang CL; Zigmond S
Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5666):1974-6. PubMed ID: 15044785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Journal lays bare remarks from peer reviewers.
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7077):642. PubMed ID: 16467803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. E-publication proposal.
Marchesi V
Science; 1999 Aug; 285(5430):1013-4. PubMed ID: 10475840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what?
Schachat AP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "E-biomed" and clinical research.
Bell C; Ruskin K
N Engl J Med; 1999 Sep; 341(14):1080-1; author reply 1081. PubMed ID: 10507926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Traditional publications: an endangered species?
Marcus A
Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Feb; 58(2 Suppl):S149-52. PubMed ID: 18240269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The youth team.
Chen J
Nature; 2001 May; 411(6833):13-4. PubMed ID: 11333946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
