1011 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11907746)
1. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chest port placement with use of the single-incision insertion technique.
Charles HW; Miguel T; Kovacs S; Gohari A; Arampulikan J; McCann JW
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1464-9. PubMed ID: 19875065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems.
Teichgräber UK; Streitparth F; Cho CH; Benter T; Gebauer B
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Sep; 32(5):975-9. PubMed ID: 19085032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access.
Funaki B; Szymski GX; Hackworth CA; Rosenblum JD; Burke R; Chang T; Leef JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1431-4. PubMed ID: 9353475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.
Bodner LJ; Nosher JL; Patel KM; Siegel RL; Biswal R; Gribbin CE; Tokarz R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10821892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.
Beckers MM; Ruven HJ; Seldenrijk CA; Prins MH; Biesma DH
Thromb Res; 2010 Apr; 125(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 19640573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.
Schwarz RE; Groeger JS; Coit DG
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 79(8):1635-40. PubMed ID: 9118051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
Lorch H; Zwaan M; Kagel C; Weiss HD
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device.
Dillon PA; Foglia RP
J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Sep; 41(9):1582-7. PubMed ID: 16952595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Central venous access catheters in children with haemophilia.
Blanchette VS; al-Musa A; Stain AM; Filler RM; Ingram J
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 1996 Mar; 7 Suppl 1():S39-44. PubMed ID: 8735796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Kimball KJ; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Estes JM; Alvarez RD
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 123(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21742372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Totally implantable central venous access devices in pediatric oncology--our experience in 46 patients.
De Backer A; Vanhulle A; Otten J; Deconinck P
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1993 Apr; 3(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 8323914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings.
Horattas MC; Trupiano J; Hopkins S; Pasini D; Martino C; Murty A
Am J Infect Control; 2001 Feb; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11172316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiological placement of chest ports in pediatric oncology patients.
Cil BE
Eur Radiol; 2004 Nov; 14(11):2015-9. PubMed ID: 15249980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prophylactic urokinase in the management of long-term venous access devices in children: a Children's Oncology Group study.
Dillon PW; Jones GR; Bagnall-Reeb HA; Buckley JD; Wiener ES; Haase GM;
J Clin Oncol; 2004 Jul; 22(13):2718-23. PubMed ID: 15226339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complication rates and outcomes of 536 implanted subcutaneous chest ports: do rates differ based on the primary operator's level of training?
Silas AM; Perrich KD; Hoffer EK; McNulty NJ
Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):464-7. PubMed ID: 20060749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PAS-Port: a new implantable vascular access device for arm placement: experiences from the first two years.
Lundberg G; Wahlberg E; Rickberg A; Olofsson P
Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 7662775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peripheral ports are a new option for central venous access.
Schuman E; Ragsdale J
J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Apr; 180(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 7719550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience.
Lee SH; Chun HJ; Choi BG
Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
