These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11907749)
1. Animal experience in the Günther Tulip retrievable inferior vena cava filter. de Gregorio MA; Gimeno MJ; Tobio R; Lostalé F; Mainar A; Beltrán JM; Madariaga B; Alfonso ER; Medrano J; Viloria A Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):413-7. PubMed ID: 11907749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Percutaneous retrieval of the Tulip vena cava filter: feasibility, short- and long-term changes--an experimental study in dogs. Neuerburg JM; Handt S; Beckert K; Tonn K; Rasmussen E; Hunter D; Günther RW Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 11907750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrievability of the Günther Tulip vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days in patients with multiple trauma. Rosenthal D; Wellons ED; Hancock SM; Burkett AB J Endovasc Ther; 2007 Jun; 14(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 17723017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perforation of the IVC: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Günther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters. Durack JC; Westphalen AC; Kekulawela S; Bhanu SB; Avrin DE; Gordon RL; Kerlan RK Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Apr; 35(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 21448771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term optional retrievability of a new inferior vena cava filter in an ovine model. Hamada A; Goktay AY; Pavcnik D; Kaufman JA; Uchida BT; Timmermans HA; Correa LO; Keller FS; Rösch J J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Nov; 16(11):1505-9. PubMed ID: 16319158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters 90 days after implantation in an ovine model: is there a time limit for removal?]. de Gregorio MA; Laborda A; Higuera MT; Lostale F; Gómez-Arrue J; Serrano C; Martínez MA; Viloria A Arch Bronconeumol; 2008 Nov; 44(11):591-6. PubMed ID: 19007565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of retrievable compared to permanent inferior vena cava filters: a single-institution experience. Van Ha TG; Chien AS; Funaki BS; Lorenz J; Piano G; Shen M; Leef J Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(2):308-15. PubMed ID: 17955289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Techniques used for difficult retrievals of the Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter: experience in 32 patients. Van Ha TG; Vinokur O; Lorenz J; Regalado S; Zangan S; Piano G; Funaki B J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Jan; 20(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 19026562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the retrievability of the OptEase IVC filter in an animal model. Reekers JA; Hoogeveen YL; Wijnands M; Bosma G; Mulder R; Oliva VL J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Mar; 15(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 15028811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrievable Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with acute deep venous thrombosis in perinatal period. Köcher M; Krcova V; Cerna M; Prochazka M Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 18242910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]