These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11910066)

  • 21. Protecting workers from secondhand smoke in North Carolina.
    Plescia M; Malek SH; Shopland DR; Anderson CM; Burns DM
    N C Med J; 2005; 66(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 16130941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of venue-specific state clean indoor air laws on smoking-related outcomes.
    Bitler MP; Carpenter CS; Zavodny M
    Health Econ; 2010 Dec; 19(12):1425-40. PubMed ID: 19998352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of four major tobacco control interventions in New Zealand: a review.
    Wilson N; Thomson G; Edwards R
    N Z Med J; 2008 Jun; 121(1276):71-86. PubMed ID: 18574511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Did the Tobacco Control Act Amendment in 1995 affect daily smoking in Finland? Effects of a restrictive workplace smoking policy.
    Helakorpi SA; Martelin TP; Torppa JO; Patja KM; Kiiskinen UA; Vartiainen EA; Uutela AK
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Dec; 30(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 18003652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of the Spanish smoking law in smoker hospitality workers.
    Martínez-Sánchez JM; Fernández E; Fu M; Pérez-Ríos M; López MJ; Ariza C; Pascual JA; Schiaffino A; Pérez-Ortuño R; Saltó E; Nebot M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2009 Sep; 11(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 19640834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does the workplace-smoking ban eliminate differences in risk for environmental tobacco smoke exposure at work?
    Verdonk-Kleinjan WM; Knibbe RA; Tan FE; Willemsen MC; de Groot HN; de Vries H
    Health Policy; 2009 Oct; 92(2-3):197-202. PubMed ID: 19398142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. US adult attitudes and practices regarding smoking restrictions and child exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: changes in the social climate from 2000-2001.
    McMillen RC; Winickoff JP; Klein JD; Weitzman M
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jul; 112(1 Pt 1):e55-60. PubMed ID: 12837906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Discomfort from environmental tobacco smoke among employees at worksites with minimal smoking restrictions--United States, 1988.
    Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1992 May; 41(20):351-4. PubMed ID: 1584192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Epidemiology of environmental tobacco smoke exposure.
    Brownson RC; Figgs LW; Caisley LE
    Oncogene; 2002 Oct; 21(48):7341-8. PubMed ID: 12379877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Smoking restrictions in private workplaces in Singapore.
    Koh YH; Voo YO; Yong LS
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Jun; 35(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 7997897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sex differences in workplace smoking policies: results from the current population survey.
    Sweeney CT; Shopland DR; Hartman AM; Gibson JT; Anderson CM; Gower KB; Burns DM
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2000; 55(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 11070655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Workplace smoking ban policy and smoking behavior.
    Kim B
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2009 Sep; 42(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 19806001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protecting children: reducing their environmental tobacco smoke exposure.
    Klerman L
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2004 Apr; 6 Suppl 2():S239-53. PubMed ID: 15203824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Environmental tobacco smoke in Finnish restaurants and bars before and after smoking restrictions were introduced.
    Johnsson T; Tuomi T; Riuttala H; Hyvärinen M; Rothberg M; Reijula K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jun; 50(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 16510489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Survey of airport smoking policies--United States, 2002.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2004 Dec; 53(50):1175-8. PubMed ID: 15614233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of smoke-free workplace legislation on exposures and health: possibilities for prevention.
    Jaakkola MS; Jaakkola JJ
    Eur Respir J; 2006 Aug; 28(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 16880370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Legislating tolerance: Spain's national public smoking law.
    Muggli ME; Lockhart NJ; Ebbert JO; Jiménez-Ruiz CA; Riesco Miranda JA; Hurt RD
    Tob Control; 2010 Feb; 19(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19850551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A longitudinal assessment of the impact of smoke-free worksite policies on tobacco use.
    Bauer JE; Hyland A; Li Q; Steger C; Cummings KM
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Jun; 95(6):1024-9. PubMed ID: 15914828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cardiovascular health and economic effects of smoke-free workplaces.
    Ong MK; Glantz SA
    Am J Med; 2004 Jul; 117(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15210386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exposure to secondhand smoke in Finnish workplaces and compliance with national smoke-free workplace legislation.
    Heloma A; Helakorpi S; Honkonen J; Danielsson P; Uutela A
    Scand J Public Health; 2011 Nov; 39(7):723-9. PubMed ID: 21893607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.