These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11910171)

  • 21. Harmonic calls and indifferent females: no preference for human consonance in an anuran.
    Akre KL; Bernal X; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140986. PubMed ID: 24990679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).
    Hall IC; Woolley SM; Kwong-Brown U; Kelley DB
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Jan; 202(1):17-34. PubMed ID: 26572136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Female responses to ancestral advertisement calls in tungara frogs.
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5222):390-2. PubMed ID: 17841263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Arginine vasotocin promotes calling behavior and call changes in male túngara frogs.
    Kime NM; Whitney TK; Davis ES; Marler CA
    Brain Behav Evol; 2007; 69(4):254-65. PubMed ID: 17299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2235-47. PubMed ID: 17956386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Elastic structures in the vocalization apparatus of the Túngara frog Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae).
    Jaramillo C; Rand AS; Ibáñez R; Dudley R
    J Morphol; 1997 Sep; 233(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 9259126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.
    Baugh AT; Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS; Bee MA
    Behav Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 130(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26692450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Signal perception in frogs and bats and the evolution of mating signals.
    Akre KL; Farris HE; Lea AM; Page RA; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6043):751-2. PubMed ID: 21817052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Developmental profiles and thyroid hormone regulation of brain transcripts in frogs: a species comparison with emphasis on Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Duarte-Guterman P; Ryan MJ; Hogan NS; Trudeau VL
    Brain Behav Evol; 2012; 79(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 22142812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory selectivity for acoustic features that confer species recognition in the tungara frog.
    Mangiamele LA; Burmeister SS
    J Exp Biol; 2011 Sep; 214(Pt 17):2911-8. PubMed ID: 21832134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of estradiol on neural responses to social signals in female túngara frogs.
    Chakraborty M; Burmeister SS
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Nov; 218(Pt 22):3671-7. PubMed ID: 26449971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Acoustic radiation patterns of mating calls of the tungara frog (Physalaemus pustuosus): implications for multiple receivers.
    Bernal XE; Page RA; Ryan MJ; Argo TF; Wilson PS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2757-67. PubMed ID: 19894851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female túngara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2608-18. PubMed ID: 14686535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Species differences in auditory processing dynamics in songbird auditory telencephalon.
    Terleph TA; Mello CV; Vicario DS
    Dev Neurobiol; 2007 Sep; 67(11):1498-510. PubMed ID: 17525994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception.
    Hoke KL; Burmeister SS; Fernald RD; Rand AS; Ryan MJ; Wilczynski W
    J Neurosci; 2004 Dec; 24(50):11264-72. PubMed ID: 15601932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Phylogeny of frogs of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group, with an examination of data incongruence.
    Cannatella DC; Hillis DM; Chippindale PT; Weigt L; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):311-35. PubMed ID: 12064230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural networks predict response biases of female túngara frogs.
    Phelps SM; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 265(1393):279-85. PubMed ID: 9523430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neurobiology of Female Mate Choice in Frogs: Auditory Filtering and Valuation.
    Burmeister SS
    Integr Comp Biol; 2017 Oct; 57(4):857-864. PubMed ID: 29048536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. SPECIES RECOGNITION AND SEXUAL SELECTION AS A UNITARY PROBLEM IN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION.
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Evolution; 1993 Apr; 47(2):647-657. PubMed ID: 28568715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Risky ripples allow bats and frogs to eavesdrop on a multisensory sexual display.
    Halfwerk W; Jones PL; Taylor RC; Ryan MJ; Page RA
    Science; 2014 Jan; 343(6169):413-6. PubMed ID: 24458640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.