These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11910224)

  • 1. Digital photography as a means of enhancing interconsultant communication in oncological cutaneous surgery.
    Karim RB; Hage JJ; Ahmed AK; de Wit FS; van de Sandt MM; Daemen A
    Ann Plast Surg; 2002 Feb; 48(2):180-3. PubMed ID: 11910224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple method of maintaining patient modesty and standardisation in plastic surgery photography.
    Morrison CM; Shoda P; Zins JE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Jun; 61(6):716. PubMed ID: 18472320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of the personal use of digital photography within plastic surgery.
    McG Taylor D; Foster E; Dunkin CS; Fitzgerald AM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 17766207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines for standard photography in plastic surgery.
    Yavuzer R; Smirnes S; Jackson IT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2001 Mar; 46(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 11293523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computer-based method of filing photographs and procedures.
    Allan JH; Cook TA
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1985 Mar; 111(3):178-81. PubMed ID: 3977742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making uniform photographic records in plastic surgery.
    Morello DC; Converse JM; Allen D
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1977 Mar; 59(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 840939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Office photography for facial cosmetic surgery.
    Beekhuis GJ; Rosenbaum JM
    Laryngoscope; 1979 Apr; 89(4):677-81. PubMed ID: 431269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Aesthetic surgery: realities of virtuality. On the influence of images, new information and communication technologies, and the internet].
    Petit F; Smarrito S; Kron C
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2003 Oct; 48(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 14599912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective facial photograph analysis using imaging software.
    Pham AM; Tollefson TT
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2010 May; 18(2):341-9, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20511080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines for the Standardization of Genital Photography.
    Joumblat NR; Chim J; Aguirre Sanchez PG; Bedolla E; Salgado CJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Sep; 38(10):1124-1130. PubMed ID: 29420725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uniform photographic documentation in facial plastic surgery.
    Thomas JR; Tardy ME; Przekop H
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1980 May; 13(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 7393578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of digital cameras.
    Miller PJ; Light J
    Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 15(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 11816121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost considerations of converting to digital photography.
    Hollenbeak CS; Kokoska M; Stack BC
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2000; 2(2):122-3. PubMed ID: 10925437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation.
    Wall S; Kazahaya K; Becker SS; Becker DG
    Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 15(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 11816120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardized photography in facial plastic surgery: pearls and pitfalls.
    Becker DG; Tardy ME
    Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 15(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11816129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical site identification with personal digital device: A prospective pilot study.
    Chen L; Parsons AM; Aria AB; Ciurea AM; Patel AB; Chan C; Griffin JR; Nguyen TH; Migden MR
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2018 Sep; 79(3):520-524. PubMed ID: 29524583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The use of digital photographs for surgical and rehabilitation records. Methods and results].
    Barry P; Meyer JC; Regnard PJ; Isselin J; Tchurukdichian A
    Chir Main; 2002 Oct; 21(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12491713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital photography in orthopaedic surgery.
    Elbeshbeshy B; Trepman E
    Foot Ankle Int; 2001 Jan; 22(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 11206828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardizing digital photography: it's not all in the eye of the beholder.
    Galdino GM; Vogel JE; Vander Kolk CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Oct; 108(5):1334-44. PubMed ID: 11604641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitfalls of comparative photography in plastic and reconstructive surgery.
    Dickason WL; Hanna DC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1976 Aug; 58(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 940869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.