These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The implementation of robotic technology in an animal facility: a case study. Glass JD; Klein HJ; Terpeluk W; Pouch WJ Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci; 2004 May; 43(3):14-7. PubMed ID: 15174811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Successful sanitation of an EDIM-infected mouse colony by breeding cessation. Held N; Hedrich HJ; Bleich A Lab Anim; 2011 Oct; 45(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 21402733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in animal housing facilities and diet may affect study outcomes-a plea for inclusion of such information in publications. Reliene R; Schiestl RH DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Jun; 5(6):651-3. PubMed ID: 16581314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of room cleaning procedures in a laboratory animal facility. Shields RP; Schramm B; Braune NE Lab Anim; 1979 Jul; 13(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 553197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automation: robots in the vivarium. Weintraub A Lab Anim (NY); 2016 Dec; 46(1):13-15. PubMed ID: 27991871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Methodological problems of sanitation expertise on the designs of interregional river flow rechanneling]. Saĭfutdinov MM Gig Sanit; 1977 Jan; 0(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 838314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of requirements for defined laboratory animals in biomedical research. Poiley SM Adv Pharmacol Chemother; 1975; 12(0):125-84. PubMed ID: 1155290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Japan bioassay laboratory. Satoh K World Hosp; 1981 May; 17(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 10251897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Laboratory animal care in Taiwan. Chiang HS; New AE Jikken Dobutsu; 1973; 22 Suppl(0):23-9. PubMed ID: 4807765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Manzanita wood: a sanitizable enrichment option for nonhuman primates. Luchins KR; Baker KC; Gilbert MH; Blanchard JL; Bohm RP J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 50(6):884-7. PubMed ID: 22330781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbiological evaluation of a newly constructed animal facility. Williams C; Greenstein G; Kopec A; Hargaden M Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 44(2):7-11. PubMed ID: 15773769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cage processing and waste management: a cost-analysis and decision-making exercise. Roe P Lab Anim (NY); 2002 Jan; 31(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 11910398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Behavioral needs of the transition cow and considerations for special needs facility design. Cook NB; Nordlund KV Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2004 Nov; 20(3):495-520. PubMed ID: 15471622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decontamination of a barrier facility using microisolator cages and provisional partitioning. Wiese E; Maurer S; Steige G; Saaler-Reinhardt S; Lecher B; Ott S; Reifenberg K Lab Anim (NY); 2007; 36(7):31-5. PubMed ID: 17585355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using site assessment and risk analysis to plan and build disaster-resistant programs and facilities. Vogelweid CM; Hill JB; Shea RA; Truby SJ; Schantz LD Lab Anim (NY); 2003 Feb; 32(2):40-4. PubMed ID: 12545184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved ventilation with CFD. Rock C J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(1):51. PubMed ID: 11924847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]