These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films. Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor]. Bai J; Chen H Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of the darkroom in radiograph quality control. Wolfgang L N Y State Dent J; 1998; 64(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 9707980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Optimal dental radiography by means of expert film processing]. Horn C Stomatol DDR; 1978 Oct; 28(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 282693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing. Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assurance: 2. The image receptor, the darkroom and processing. Horner K Dent Update; 1992 Apr; 19(3):120, 122-4, 126. PubMed ID: 1291369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of manual and automatic processing in general dental practice. Rout PG; Rogers SN; Chapman M; Rippin JW Br Dent J; 1996 Aug; 181(3):99-101. PubMed ID: 8810109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions. Akdeniz BG; Lomçali G Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9656875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions. Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of five methods for monitoring the precision of automated x-ray film processors. Nickoloff EL; Leo F; Reese M Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):509-14. PubMed ID: 704868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative sensitometric x-ray film study. Fleming RD Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1971 May; 31(5):701-18. PubMed ID: 5280240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques. Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Sensitometric characteristics of medical roentgenographic and fluorographic films. Sensitivity of the amplifying screens combined with a film]. Gurvich AM; Erofeeva ND; Katomina RV; Maslov LA Med Tekh; 1976; (2):17-22. PubMed ID: 1030760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Results of a study on roentgen film processing in automatic film-developing systems]. Weberling R Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):109-12. PubMed ID: 4001773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]