These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11911385)
1. Visual marking: dissociating effects of new and old set size. Jiang Y; Chun MM; Marks LE J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Mar; 28(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 11911385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking. Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking. Meinhardt G; Persike M J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Awareness of the continuously visible: information acquisition during preview. Becker MW; Pashler H Percept Psychophys; 2005 Nov; 67(8):1391-403. PubMed ID: 16555591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Jiang Y; Chun MM; Marks LE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):717-30. PubMed ID: 12075898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search. Yamauchi K; Osugi T; Murakami I Front Psychol; 2017; 8():801. PubMed ID: 28559878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Previewing distractors reduces efficiency of visual processing at previewed locations. Osugi T; Murakami I Vision Res; 2014 Feb; 95():51-60. PubMed ID: 24368220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis. Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking. Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What kind of memory supports visual marking? Jiang Y; Wang SW J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 14769069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attentional shift to the newer object in the successive and simultaneous distractors previewing search. Osugi T Vision Res; 2023 Aug; 209():108262. PubMed ID: 37210863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search. Watson DG; Humphreys GW Percept Psychophys; 2005 Apr; 67(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 16119391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preview benefit survives a three-dimensional rotation of the rigid configuration of search items. Osugi T; Murakami I Vision Res; 2019 Mar; 156():56-65. PubMed ID: 30682404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resisting change: the influence of luminance changes on visual marking and the preview benefit. Watson DG; Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1526-39. PubMed ID: 19064495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Out with the old: inhibition of old items in a preview search is limited. Emrich SM; Ruppel JD; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1552-7. PubMed ID: 19064497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual marking and facial affect: can an emotional face be ignored? Blagrove E; Watson DG Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):147-68. PubMed ID: 20364892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Search of jumping items: visual marking and discrete motion. Olds ES; McMurtry CM Perception; 2003; 32(4):449-62. PubMed ID: 12785483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual working memory supports the inhibition of previously processed information: evidence from preview search. Al-Aidroos N; Emrich SM; Ferber S; Pratt J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):643-63. PubMed ID: 21988363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]