These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11911385)

  • 21. Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 12713240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients.
    Osugi T; Kawahara JI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: evidence from the "top-up" procedure.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 16933757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What is "marked" in visual marking? Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Aug; 65(6):982-96. PubMed ID: 14528904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual marking: a convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search.
    Atchley P; Jones SE; Hoffman L
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 12956576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):667-88. PubMed ID: 15301617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does previewing one stimulus feature help conjunction search?
    Olds ES; Fockler KA
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):195-216. PubMed ID: 15109162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks.
    von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. When a reappearance is old news: visual marking survives occlusion.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):185-98. PubMed ID: 12669757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search.
    Gibson BS; Jiang Y
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jan; 63(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 11304017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Determining the capacity of time-based selection.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):350-66. PubMed ID: 22004197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is it impossible to inhibit isoluminant items, or does it simply take longer? Evidence from preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Hulleman J; Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Feb; 68(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 16773900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of dynamic attention: Time-based visual selection for objects in motion between 6-12 years of age.
    Zupan Z; Blagrove EL; Watson DG
    Dev Psychol; 2023 Feb; 59(2):312-325. PubMed ID: 36136786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preview search and contextual cuing.
    Hodsoll JP; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1346-58. PubMed ID: 16366794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search.
    Humphreys GW; Stalmann BJ; Olivers C
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):713-30. PubMed ID: 15495898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prioritization in visual search: visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW; Heinke D; Cooper AC
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 May; 64(4):540-60. PubMed ID: 12132757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Learning to ignore: The development of time-based visual attention in children.
    Zupan Z; Blagrove E; Watson DG
    Dev Psychol; 2018 Dec; 54(12):2248-2264. PubMed ID: 30382717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.