These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11913379)

  • 1. Folding funnels: the key to robust protein structure prediction.
    Hardin C; Eastwood MP; Prentiss M; Luthey-Schulten Z; Wolynes PG
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 11913379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions.
    Kinch LN; Wrabl JO; Krishna SS; Majumdar I; Sadreyev RI; Qi Y; Pei J; Cheng H; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():395-409. PubMed ID: 14579328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft energy function and generic evolutionary method for discriminating native from nonnative protein conformations.
    Chiu YY; Hwang JK; Yang JM
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Jul; 29(9):1364-73. PubMed ID: 18181137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protein conformational transitions coupled to binding in molecular recognition of unstructured proteins: deciphering the effect of intermolecular interactions on computational structure prediction of the p27Kip1 protein bound to the cyclin A-cyclin-dependent kinase 2 complex.
    Verkhivker GM
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):706-16. PubMed ID: 15609350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimizing physical energy functions for protein folding.
    Fujitsuka Y; Takada S; Luthey-Schulten ZA; Wolynes PG
    Proteins; 2004 Jan; 54(1):88-103. PubMed ID: 14705026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein structure prediction of CASP5 comparative modeling and fold recognition targets using consensus alignment approach and 3D assessment.
    Ginalski K; Rychlewski L
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():410-7. PubMed ID: 14579329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequence-based protein structure prediction using a reduced state-space hidden Markov model.
    Lampros C; Costas Papaloukas ; Exarchos TP; Yorgos Goletsis ; Fotiadis DI
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Sep; 37(9):1211-24. PubMed ID: 17161834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of physics-based methodology for exploring the conformational energy landscape of proteins.
    Scheraga HA; Pillardy J; Liwo A; Lee J; Czaplewski C; Ripoll DR; Wedemeyer WJ; Arnautova YA
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11913387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Template-free protein structure prediction and quality assessment with an all-atom free-energy model.
    Gopal SM; Klenin K; Wenzel W
    Proteins; 2009 Nov; 77(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 19422063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An efficient conformational sampling method for homology modeling.
    Han R; Leo-Macias A; Zerbino D; Bastolla U; Contreras-Moreira B; Ortiz AR
    Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):175-88. PubMed ID: 17985353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of the folding energy landscapes of computer generated proteins suggests high folding free energy barriers and cooperativity may be consequences of natural selection.
    Scalley-Kim M; Baker D
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 338(3):573-83. PubMed ID: 15081814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of 3D-Jury, GRDB, and Verify3D in fold recognition.
    von Grotthuss M; Pas J; Wyrwicz L; Ginalski K; Rychlewski L
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():418-23. PubMed ID: 14579330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Go-like interactions on global shapes of energy landscapes in beta-barrel forming model proteins: inherent structure analysis and statistical temperature molecular dynamics simulation.
    Kim J; Keyes T
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Jan; 112(3):954-66. PubMed ID: 18088107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP7 domain prediction category.
    Tress M; Cheng J; Baldi P; Joo K; Lee J; Seo JH; Lee J; Baker D; Chivian D; Kim D; Ezkurdia I
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():137-51. PubMed ID: 17680686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.
    Dominy BN; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 11913380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduced protein models and their application to the protein folding problem.
    Skolnick J; Kolinski A; Ortiz AR
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 1998 Oct; 16(2):381-96. PubMed ID: 9833676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geometrical features of the protein folding mechanism are a robust property of the energy landscape: a detailed investigation of several reduced models.
    Oliveira LC; Schug A; Onuchic JN
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 May; 112(19):6131-6. PubMed ID: 18251535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scoring function accuracy for membrane protein structure prediction.
    Gao C; Stern HA
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 17407162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Another look at the conditions for the extraction of protein knowledge-based potentials.
    Betancourt MR
    Proteins; 2009 Jul; 76(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 19089977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility.
    Schueler-Furman O; Wang C; Baker D
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15981249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.