385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11913435)
1. Parents say federal agency helps protect researchers from more than their subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 11913435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Subject's parents say federal protection office had inherent conflict of interest.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Aug; 15(8):5-6. PubMed ID: 12199291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ... (Part I).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Nov; 14(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 12194197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical ethics in the dock.
N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research.
Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. True protection for persons with severe mental disabilities, such as schizophrenia, involved as subjects in research? A look and consideration of the "Protection of Human Subjects.
Ryan AJ
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(2):349-76. PubMed ID: 11657417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The ethics of conducting psychosis-inducing experiments.
Sharav VH
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):137-67. PubMed ID: 11658172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part IV).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11660762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Our responsibilities toward persons with mental illness as human subjects in research.
Shamoo AE
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11653306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Subject's parents claim university was not responsive to their requests.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Sep; 15(9):5-6. PubMed ID: 11917938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Parents say that controversial study was not ethically justifiable.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Dec; 15(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 11789518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are existing safeguards adequate?
Caplan AL
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 11653316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. V.A. hospital is told to halt all research.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1999 Mar; ():A25. PubMed ID: 11648101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Agency faults a U.C.L.A. study for suffering of mental patients.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11647969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent to human subject research: improving the process of obtaining informed consent from mentally ill persons.
Derrickson D
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 25(1):143-65. PubMed ID: 12173638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who's watching the watchdogs? Responding to the erosion of research ethics by enforcing promises.
Alvino LA
Columbia Law Rev; 2003; 103():893-924. PubMed ID: 15732202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Money is putting people at risk in biomedical research.
Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 2000 Mar; 46(27):B1, B4-5. PubMed ID: 11657699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
