181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11913655)
1. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test.
Martins EP; Diniz-Filho JA; Housworth EA
Evolution; 2002 Jan; 56(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11913655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the relative merits of a few methods to detect evolutionary trends.
Laurin M
Syst Biol; 2010 Dec; 59(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 20937759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Euclidean nature of phylogenetic distance matrices.
de Vienne DM; Aguileta G; Ollier S
Syst Biol; 2011 Dec; 60(6):826-32. PubMed ID: 21804094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phylogeny, regression, and the allometry of physiological traits.
O'Connor MP; Agosta SJ; Hansen F; Kemp SJ; Sieg AE; McNair JN; Dunham AE
Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):431-42. PubMed ID: 17879193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised.
Felsenstein J
Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):713-25. PubMed ID: 18419518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonlinear relationships and phylogenetically independent contrasts.
Quader S; Isvaran K; Hale RE; Miner BG; Seavy NE
J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 15149413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Independent Evolution Method Is Not a Viable Phylogenetic Comparative Method.
Griffin RH; Yapuncich GS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144147. PubMed ID: 26683838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of topological inaccuracy in evolutionary trees on the phylogenetic comparative method of independent contrasts.
Symonds MR
Syst Biol; 2002 Aug; 51(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 12227998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods.
Ives AR; Midford PE; Garland T
Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):252-70. PubMed ID: 17464881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology.
Garland T; Bennett AF; Rezende EL
J Exp Biol; 2005 Aug; 208(Pt 16):3015-35. PubMed ID: 16081601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulation-based likelihood approach for evolutionary models of phenotypic traits on phylogeny.
Kutsukake N; Innan H
Evolution; 2013 Feb; 67(2):355-67. PubMed ID: 23356609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables.
Ives AR; Garland T
Syst Biol; 2010 Jan; 59(1):9-26. PubMed ID: 20525617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative method for studying adaptation to a randomly evolving environment.
Hansen TF; Pienaar J; Orzack SH
Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):1965-77. PubMed ID: 18452574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The degree and pattern of phylogenetic signal in primate long-bone structure.
O'Neill MC; Dobson SD
J Hum Evol; 2008 Mar; 54(3):309-22. PubMed ID: 17931688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Poor statistical performance of the Mantel test in phylogenetic comparative analyses.
Harmon LJ; Glor RE
Evolution; 2010 Jul; 64(7):2173-8. PubMed ID: 20163450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts.
Price T
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1997 Apr; 352(1352):519-29. PubMed ID: 9163825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phylogenetic targeting of research effort in evolutionary biology.
Arnold C; Nunn CL
Am Nat; 2010 Nov; 176(5):601-12. PubMed ID: 20887190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Seeking the evolutionary regression coefficient: an analysis of what comparative methods measure.
Pagel M
J Theor Biol; 1993 Sep; 164(2):191-205. PubMed ID: 8246516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PHYLOGENIES, SPATIAL AUTOREGRESSION, AND THE COMPARATIVE METHOD: A COMPUTER SIMULATION TEST.
Martins EP
Evolution; 1996 Oct; 50(5):1750-1765. PubMed ID: 28565598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
