These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11913748)

  • 21. A parallel form of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale.
    Gudjonsson GH
    Br J Clin Psychol; 1987 Sep; 26(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 3664038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Features and feedback: enhancing metamnemonic knowledge at retrieval reduces source-monitoring errors.
    Lane SM; Roussel CC; Villa D; Morita SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 17983318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A temporal discriminability account of children's eyewitness suggestibility.
    Bright-Paul A; Jarrold C
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jul; 12(4):647-61. PubMed ID: 19635090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The relationships between suggestibility, influenceability, and relaxability.
    Polczyk R; Frey O; Szpitalak M
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2013; 61(3):319-35. PubMed ID: 23679114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A little elaboration goes a long way: the role of generation in eyewitness suggestibility.
    Lane SM; Zaragoza MS
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1255-66. PubMed ID: 18035625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Developmental differences in eyewitness suggestibility and memory for source.
    Ackil JK; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Aug; 60(1):57-83. PubMed ID: 7666038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The British use of the Barber Suggestibility Scale: norms, psychometric properties and the effects of the sex of the subject and of the experimenter.
    Fellows BJ
    Br J Psychol; 1979 Nov; 70(4):547-57. PubMed ID: 509020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Eyewitness recall and suggestibility in individuals with Down syndrome.
    Collins D; Henry L
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2016 Dec; 60(12):1227-1231. PubMed ID: 27381963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Children's suggestibility in relation to their understanding about sources of knowledge.
    Robinson EJ; Whitcombe EL
    Child Dev; 2003; 74(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 12625435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Event memory and suggestibility in abused and neglected children: trauma-related psychopathology and cognitive functioning.
    Chae Y; Goodman GS; Eisen ML; Qin J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Dec; 110(4):520-38. PubMed ID: 21784433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Children's eyewitness memory: repeating post-event misinformation reduces the distinctiveness of a witnessed event.
    Bright-Paul A; Jarrold C
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):818-35. PubMed ID: 22963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adult eyewitness memory and compliance: effects of post-event misinformation on memory for a negative event.
    Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS; Ibabe I
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):541-58. PubMed ID: 24022799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental and meta-analytic evidence that source variability of misinformation does not increase eyewitness suggestibility independently of repetition of misinformation.
    O'Donnell R; Chan JCK; Foster JL; Garry M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1201674. PubMed ID: 37691811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Source monitoring in eyewitness memory: implicit associations, suggestions, and episodic traces.
    Hekkanen ST; McEvoy C
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jul; 33(5):759-69. PubMed ID: 16383165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. gist testing.
    Pansky A; Tenenboim E
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):155-70. PubMed ID: 21264588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Memory states and memory tasks: an integrative framework for eyewitness memory and suggestibility.
    Blank H
    Memory; 1998 Sep; 6(5):481-529. PubMed ID: 10197161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research. A new survey of the experts.
    Kassin SM; Tubb VA; Hosch HM; Memon A
    Am Psychol; 2001 May; 56(5):405-16. PubMed ID: 11355363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Potential jurors' opinions on the effects of hypnosis on eyewitness identification: a brief communication.
    Labelle L; Lamarche MC; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 2258247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retrieval does not always enhance suggestibility: testing can improve witness identification performance.
    LaPaglia JA; Chan JC
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):478-87. PubMed ID: 23205595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of eyewitness expert evidence and judicial instruction on juror ability to evaluate eyewitness testimony.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 18597165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.