These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11913753)

  • 1. Category variability, exemplar similarity, and perceptual classification.
    Cohen AL; Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Dec; 29(8):1165-75. PubMed ID: 11913753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of category variability in perceptual categorization.
    Stewart N; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):893-907. PubMed ID: 12219797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tests of an exemplar-memory model of classification learning in a high-dimensional natural-science category domain.
    Nosofsky RM; Sanders CA; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Mar; 147(3):328-353. PubMed ID: 29058939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speeded classification in a probabilistic category structure: contrasting exemplar-retrieval, decision-boundary, and prototype models.
    Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Jun; 31(3):608-29. PubMed ID: 15982134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Typicality in logically defined categories: exemplar-similarity versus rule instantiation.
    Nosofsky RM
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Mar; 19(2):131-50. PubMed ID: 2017037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification response times in probabilistic rule-based category structures: contrasting exemplar-retrieval and decision-boundary models.
    Nosofsky RM; Little DR
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Oct; 38(7):916-27. PubMed ID: 20921104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):1022-41. PubMed ID: 11486917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing formal cognitive models of classification and old-new recognition in a real-world high-dimensional category domain.
    Meagher BJ; Nosofsky RM
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Sep; 145():101596. PubMed ID: 37657152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Categorization by schema relations and perceptual similarity in 5-year-olds and adults: A study in vision and in audition.
    Berger C; Donnadieu S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Apr; 93(4):304-21. PubMed ID: 16330042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge partitioning in categorization: constraints on exemplar models.
    Yang LX; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):1045-64. PubMed ID: 15355135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual noise reveals category representations.
    Gold JM; Cohen AL; Shiffrin R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Aug; 13(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 17201365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissimilarity is used as evidence of category membership in multidimensional perceptual categorization: a test of the similarity-dissimilarity generalized context model.
    Stewart N; Morin C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Oct; 60(10):1337-46. PubMed ID: 17853242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infants' formation and use of categories to segregate objects.
    Needham A; Dueker G; Lockhead G
    Cognition; 2005 Jan; 94(3):215-40. PubMed ID: 15617672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the psychological structure of transformational knowledge in visual and haptic intramodal conditions using multidimensional scaling.
    Do PT; Homa D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Oct; 115(2):443-64. PubMed ID: 23265010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.
    Palmeri TJ; Nosofsky RM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):197-235. PubMed ID: 11216316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similarity-dissimilarity competition in disjunctive classification tasks.
    Mathy F; Haladjian HH; Laurent E; Goldstone RL
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():26. PubMed ID: 23403979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch.
    Gaissert N; Bülthoff HH; Wallraven C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):219-30. PubMed ID: 21752344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distributional expectations and the induction of category structure.
    Flannagan MJ; Fried LS; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Apr; 12(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 2939181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similarity, typicality, and category-level matching of morphed outlines of everyday objects.
    Panis S; Vangeneugden J; Wagemans J
    Perception; 2008; 37(12):1822-49. PubMed ID: 19227375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time course of similarity effects in visual search.
    Guest D; Lamberts K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1667-88. PubMed ID: 22004196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.