These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11915657)

  • 1. Alternative implant impression techniques.
    Phillips K; Goto Y
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Feb; 23(2):170-2, 174. PubMed ID: 11915657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simplified impression technique for implant-supported crowns.
    Haubenreich JE; Robinson FG
    Dent Clin North Am; 2006 Jul; 50(3):439-49, vii. PubMed ID: 16818025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The "first implant": protocol for the GP, Part 3.
    Tischler M; Ganz SD
    Dent Today; 2011 Dec; 30(12):64, 66, 68-9. PubMed ID: 22324106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simplified technique for creating a customized gingival emergence profile for implant-supported crowns.
    Azer SS
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):497-501. PubMed ID: 20456028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
    Kuo SB; Hong HH; Tsai TP; Shen YF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Master cast implant impression: using the open-tray technique.
    Briley TF
    Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Oct; 13(10):73-80. PubMed ID: 12455316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restoration of a modified solid abutment of the ITI dental implant system: one of the most unique systems in implant dentistry.
    Charters RT
    J Dent Technol; 2001; 18(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 11323952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The abutment duplication technique: a novel protocol for cementable implant-supported restorations.
    Cocchetto R; Resch I; Castagna M; Vincenzi G; Celletti R
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):415-24. PubMed ID: 20664844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tolerance measurements of various implant components.
    Ma T; Nicholls JI; Rubenstein JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 9197102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative technique for the accurate transfer of periimplant soft tissue contour.
    Man Y; Qu Y; Dam HG; Gong P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 23395340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures.
    Jannesar S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17451474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.