These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. [Quality control of amalgam restorations. II. A comparison of 4 non-clinical review methods]. Borgmeyer PJ; Advocaat JG; Akerboom HB Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1982 Oct; 89(10):397-404. PubMed ID: 6960261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Defects in amalgam restorations]. Tabacof G Rev Odontoestomatol; 1972; 13(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 4511677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Clinical study of the failures in amalgam restorations]. Gabrielli F; Rolfsen RL; Dinelli W; Fontana UF Rev Fac Farm Odontol Araraquara; 1972; 6(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 4512875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Stereophotogrametric evaluation of the interproximal contact, in amalgam restorations as related to the type of matrix-retainers and matrices. I. Upper 1st bicuspid]. dos Santos Junior J; Fichman IM; Guidi D; de Lima CA Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1975; 13(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 1073581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Fracture strength of Class II amalgam restorations (author's transl)]. Coradazzi JL; Mondelli J Estomatol Cult; 1972; 6(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 4525849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Fracture strength of classes I and II amalgam restorations condensed on different cement bases. Vieira DF; Mondelli J Estomatol Cult; 1971; 5(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 5291994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Failure in dental restorations in dental students in Bahia]. Tabacof G Rev Gaucha Odontol; 1973; 21(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 4526751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of burnishing on the marginal seal of amalgam restorations. Kato S; Okuse K; Fusayama T J Prosthet Dent; 1968 Apr; 19(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 5237527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. When to replace faulty-margin amalgam restorations: a pilot study. Maryniuk GA; Brunson WD Gen Dent; 1989; 37(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 2700979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The strength of class II amalgam restorations with and without pins. Mondelli J; Vieira DF J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Aug; 28(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 4504302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of impact loading upon Class II amalgam restoration. Johnson BE ASDC J Dent Child; 1972; 39(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 4553905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of three types of pins on compressive strength of dental amalgam. Duperon DF; Kasloff Z J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1971 Nov; 37(11):422-8. PubMed ID: 5288885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Homodent-1, a new state of the art Hungarian amalgam]. Lovász A; Tardy P Fogorv Sz; 1988 Dec; 81(12):353-60. PubMed ID: 3256478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of manual and mechanical condensation of amalgam by dental students and by graduate dentists. Starr JM J Dent Educ; 1971 Mar; 35(3):183-4 passim. PubMed ID: 5278856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Marginal fracture of amalgam restorations. A review. Bryant RW Aust Dent J; 1981 Aug; 26(4):222-4. PubMed ID: 7030285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]