These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11916220)

  • 1. Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions.
    Steel PD; Kammeyer-Mueller JD
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Feb; 87(1):96-111. PubMed ID: 11916220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of nonlinear regression with extended least squares: simulation study.
    Thomson AH; Kelman AW; Whiting B
    J Pharm Sci; 1985 Dec; 74(12):1327-30. PubMed ID: 4087201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of interactions between a dichotomous moderator and a continuous predictor in moderated multiple regression with heterogeneous error variance.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Feb; 41(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 19182125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using multiple group modeling to test moderators in meta-analysis.
    Schoemann AM
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 27936303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some recommended statistical analytic practices when reliability generalization studies are conducted.
    Sánchez-Meca J; López-López JA; López-Pina JA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):402-25. PubMed ID: 23046285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Varying coefficient meta-analytic methods for alpha reliability.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):368-85. PubMed ID: 20853952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of an overall standardized mean difference in random-effects meta-analysis if the distribution of random effects departs from normal.
    Rubio-Aparicio M; López-López JA; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Viechtbauer W; Van den Noortgate W
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):489-503. PubMed ID: 29989344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-CART: A tool to identify interactions between moderators in meta-analysis.
    Li X; Dusseldorp E; Meulman JJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):118-136. PubMed ID: 28130936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A methodological review of meta-analyses of the effectiveness of clinical psychology treatments.
    Rubio-Aparicio M; Marín-Martínez F; Sánchez-Meca J; López-López JA
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):2057-2073. PubMed ID: 29052165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A flexible approach to identify interaction effects between moderators in meta-analysis.
    Li X; Dusseldorp E; Meulman JJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):134-152. PubMed ID: 30511514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation study to compare robust tests for linear mixed-effects meta-regression.
    Welz T; Pauly M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):331-342. PubMed ID: 31930705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods.
    Field AP
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Jun; 6(2):161-80. PubMed ID: 11411440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing.
    Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters.
    Jak S; Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):430-455. PubMed ID: 31670537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Hittner JB; May K
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synthesizer 1.0: a varying-coefficient meta-analytic tool.
    Krizan Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 20805608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the calibration process of film dosimetry: OLS inverse regression versus WLS inverse prediction.
    Crop F; Van Rompaye B; Paelinck L; Vakaet L; Thierens H; De Wagter C
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(14):3971-84. PubMed ID: 18596368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective Weighted Least Squares Method for Fourier Transform Infrared Quantitative Analysis.
    Wang X; Li Y; Wei H; Chen X
    Appl Spectrosc; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1231-1241. PubMed ID: 27798384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.