92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11917314)
1. Estimating true burden of disease detected by screening tests of varying validity.
Mishra RN; Mishra CP; Reddy DC; Gupta VM
Indian J Public Health; 2001; 45(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11917314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of a modified Parkinson's disease screening questionnaire in India: effects of literacy of participants and medical training of screeners and implications for screening efforts in developing countries.
Sarangmath N; Rattihalli R; Ragothaman M; Gopalkrishna G; Doddaballapur S; Louis ED; Muthane UB
Mov Disord; 2005 Dec; 20(12):1550-6. PubMed ID: 16078206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols.
Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 17722203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood test within a multiple disease screening programme: an experience from Keelung, Taiwan.
Yang KC; Liao CS; Chiu YH; Yen AM; Chen TH
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 17227635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation II: Applications in human diseases. International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting.
Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Nov; 142(10):1059-68. PubMed ID: 7485051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Undetected burden of tuberculosis in a low-prevalence area.
Baussano I; Bugiani M; Gregori D; van Hest R; Borraccino A; Raso R; Merletti F
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2006 Apr; 10(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 16602406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Should we screen for hemochromatosis? Critical analysis of the literature].
Charvet-Protat S; Yaouanq J; Fleurette F
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1997 Sep; 45(4):315-27. PubMed ID: 9380912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test.
Dendukuri N; Rahme E; Bélisle P; Joseph L
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 15180664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: predictive value of screening tests.
Phelps JR; Ghaemi SN
J Affect Disord; 2006 Jun; 92(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16529822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitoring congenital rubella embryopathy.
Rittler M; López-Camelo J; Castilla EE
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2004 Dec; 70(12):939-43. PubMed ID: 15558544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of methods of evaluation in psychiatry].
Fombonne E; Fuhrer R
Encephale; 1991; 17(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 2049997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel design for estimating relative accuracy of screening tests when complete disease verification is not feasible.
Alonzo TA; Kittelson JM
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):605-12. PubMed ID: 16918926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease and the use of therapies for secondary prevention in a rural region of India.
Joshi R; Chow CK; Raju PK; Raju R; Reddy KS; Macmahon S; Lopez AD; Neal B
Circulation; 2009 Apr; 119(14):1950-5. PubMed ID: 19332466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating regional cancer burden in countries with partial registration coverage: an application to all malignant neoplasms in Italy over the period 1970-2010.
Grande E; Inghelmann R; Francisci S; Verdecchia A; Micheli A; Capocaccia R; De Angelis R
Eur J Cancer; 2006 Dec; 42(18):3236-45. PubMed ID: 17055719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The validity of serologic tests for Trypanosoma cruzi and the effectiveness of transfusional screening strategies in a hyperendemic region.
Pirard M; Iihoshi N; Boelaert M; Basanta P; López F; Van der Stuyft P
Transfusion; 2005 Apr; 45(4):554-61. PubMed ID: 15819677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Population-based screening versus case detection.
Thomas R; Parikh R; Paul P; Muliyil J
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 50(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 12355704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Global estimation of foodborne diseases.
Motarjemi Y; Käferstein FK
World Health Stat Q; 1997; 50(1-2):5-11. PubMed ID: 9282382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity of neonatal tetanus surveillance system in India.
Singh J; Datta KK; Foster SO
Indian Pediatr; 1997 May; 34(5):398-401. PubMed ID: 9332113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating sample size for a randomized clinical trial of lung cancer screening.
Obuchowski NA
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):466-77. PubMed ID: 18088564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
