179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11917409)
1. Caesarean conference report: from Audit to Action. January 31, 2002.
McGlynn AG
RCM Midwives J; 2002 Mar; 5(3):100-2. PubMed ID: 11917409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Review of the National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report.
Wray J
Pract Midwife; 2001 Dec; 4(11):24-5. PubMed ID: 12026696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit.
Thomas J; Callwood A; Brocklehurst P; Walker J
BJOG; 2000 May; 107(5):579-80. PubMed ID: 10826569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit: update.
Thomas J; Callwood A; Paranjothy S
Pract Midwife; 2000 Dec; 3(11):20. PubMed ID: 12026561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. National C-section audit ... what it won't tell you.
Walsh D
Pract Midwife; 2000 Nov; 3(10):26-7. PubMed ID: 12026490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Obstetricians' and midwives' attitudes toward cesarean section.
Monari F; Di Mario S; Facchinetti F; Basevi V
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18507584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit.
Callwood A; Thomas J
Pract Midwife; 2000 Jun; 3(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 11260996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Caesarean section: the facts.
Beech BA
Pract Midwife; 2001 Nov; 4(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 12026586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Attitudes of midwives in Sweden toward a woman's refusal of an emergency cesarean section or a cesarean section on request.
Danerek M; Maršál K; Cuttini M; Lingman G; Nilstun T; Dykes AK
Birth; 2011 Mar; 38(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 21332777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Making sense of the national sentinel caesarean section audit: an executive summary.
RCM Midwives; 2002 Dec; 5(12):414-5. PubMed ID: 12518599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midwifery. Staffing link to caesarean rate.
Kenny C
Nurs Times; 2001 Nov 1-7; 97(44):9. PubMed ID: 11966181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term.
Anderson T
Pract Midwife; 2006 Sep; 9(8):34-5. PubMed ID: 16989416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Current practice of cesarean delivery on maternal request following the 2006 state-of-the-science conference.
Coleman-Cowger VH; Erickson K; Spong CY; Portnoy B; Croswell J; Schulkin J
J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 20337204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Who is responsible for the rising caesarean section rate?
Usha Kiran TS; Jayawickrama NS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):363-5. PubMed ID: 12521454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A family-centered cesarean birth.
Hirsch SS
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2010; (95):38-9, 67. PubMed ID: 20949794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NICE guidelines aim to stem caesarean rate.
RCM Midwives; 2004 Jun; 7(6):234. PubMed ID: 15197830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Change though consensus and commitment. All-Wales clinical pathway for normal labour.
Fergusson P
Pract Midwife; 2003 Mar; 6(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 12677833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Caesareans on the rise--a cause for concern?
Lewison H
Mod Midwife; 1994 May; 4(5):24-7. PubMed ID: 7788382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cesarean section and current obstetrics. 1950].
Sardiñas Ramírez A
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2005 Mar; 73(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 21961355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. One baby at a time. The way to make a difference in an imperfect system.
Randleman C
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2001; (58):54-5. PubMed ID: 12154729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
